From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se>
Cc: Bernhard Busch <bbusch@biochem.mpg.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Poor Performance for ethernet bonding
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 08:16:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B866FDE.4003F3DD@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0108241630060.17009-100000@tux.rsn.bth.se>
Martin Josefsson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Bernhard Busch wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > I have tried to use ethernet network interfaces bonding to increase
> > peformance.
> >
> > Bonding is working fine, but the performance is rather poor.
> > FTP between 2 machines ( kernel 2.4.4 and 4 port DLink 100Mbit ethernet
> > card)
> > results in a transfer rate of 3MB/s).
> >
> > Any Hints?
>
> I've seen this too, it doesn't have anything to do with bonding, it's the
> fact that you are sending packets out several interfaces at once that's
> the cause. Same thing happend to me when transmitting at high speeds on
> two interfaces at once without bonding. And you are using 4 interfaces so
> I can imagine that it will be even worse than I saw.
>
> And bonding on my two eepro100 in another machine works perfectly,
> no problem maxing out at aproximatly 200Mbit.
I've run a sustained 10Mbps tx & rx on 8 ports (2 of the Dlink 4-port NICs)
for over 24 hours on a 2.4.7 kernel. I was not using bonding though. I'm guessing you're
seeing lots of carrier errors, as the tulip driver used to be very bad
at...uh..working. Try a 2.4.6 kernel or better and I bet your problem
goes away...
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear@excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-24 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-24 13:37 Poor Performance for ethernet bonding Bernhard Busch
2001-08-24 14:12 ` Sergey Ostrovsky
2001-08-24 14:33 ` Martin Josefsson
2001-08-24 15:16 ` Ben Greear [this message]
[not found] <3B865882.24D57941@biochem.mpg.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-08-24 13:44 ` Andi Kleen
2001-08-24 15:19 ` Ben Greear
2001-08-24 15:22 ` Andi Kleen
2001-08-24 15:45 ` Ben Greear
2001-08-24 16:04 ` Andi Kleen
2001-08-27 7:40 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-08-24 18:17 ` Thomas Davis
2001-08-24 20:59 ` Ben Greear
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-25 7:04 Willy Tarreau
2001-08-25 18:23 ` Ben Greear
2001-08-26 7:59 ` willy tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B866FDE.4003F3DD@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=bbusch@biochem.mpg.de \
--cc=gandalf@wlug.westbo.se \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.