From: "Peter Wächtler" <pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de>
To: Samium Gromoff <_deepfire@mail.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lilo vs other OS bootloaders was: FreeBSD makes progress
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 14:03:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B90CE7E.F4F54D9@loewe-komp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200109011455.f81Ethw00685@vegae.deep.net>
Samium Gromoff wrote:
>
> ANdreas Dilger wrote:
> > Win2K even abstracts all SMP/UP code into a module (the HAL) and loads this
> > at boot, thus using the same kernel for both.
> the only possibility of this shows how ugly is SMP in win2k...
> this is a situation where they are or geniuses or idiots.
> MS never proved to be geniuses so they still are idiots...
>
Did someone any benchmarking?
I expect the loss of performance per application a none issue.
What do you think: >0.5%?
Are you considering interrupt latency in the first place?
Then obviously BeOS is also engineered from idiots...
Oh, and QNX/RTP has separate kernels for UP/SMP. And they
don't need UP/SMP versions of "modules".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-01 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-01 14:55 lilo vs other OS bootloaders was: FreeBSD makes progress Samium Gromoff
2001-09-01 12:03 ` Peter Wächtler [this message]
2001-09-01 12:39 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-01 14:10 ` Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-05 21:18 Grover, Andrew
2001-09-05 22:11 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-05 22:13 ` Tim Hockin
2001-09-04 21:52 Grover, Andrew
2001-09-05 1:51 ` David S. Miller
2001-09-05 8:03 ` Helge Hafting
2001-09-05 14:26 ` Horst von Brand
2001-09-11 22:48 ` Pavel Machek
2001-08-31 21:49 Grover, Andrew
2001-08-31 22:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-08-31 22:50 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-01 15:50 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-08 17:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-09-08 18:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B90CE7E.F4F54D9@loewe-komp.de \
--to=pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de \
--cc=_deepfire@mail.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.