All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdlab.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linus <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	sfr@canb.auug.org.au, crutcher+kernel@datastacks.com
Subject: [PATCH:v2] fix register_sysrq() in 2.4.9++
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:57:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BAA3C17.557A2C4E@osdlab.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15k86n-0005lE-00@the-village.bc.nu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 595 bytes --]

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > Yeah, I considered that, and it doesn't matter to me whether it
> > reports 0 or -1, but it's the data pointer that (mostly) requires
> > the #ifdefs, unless the data is always present or a dummy data pointer
> > is used.... ?
> 
> #define it to an inline without some arguments ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I can't get that to work, but someone else may be able to...

Here's another version for you to consider.

The [un]register_sysrq_key() calls return 0 when CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ
is not defined/configured.
However, it sacrifices one small data structure of 3 pointers.

~Randy

[-- Attachment #2: sysrq-if2.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 734 bytes --]

--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c.org	Mon Sep 17 10:15:45 2001
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c	Thu Sep 20 11:51:25 2001
@@ -703,6 +703,8 @@
 	help_msg:       "Off",
 	action_msg:     "Power Off\n"
 };
+#else
+struct sysrq_key_op sysrq_poweroff_op;
 #endif
 
 
--- linux/include/linux/sysrq.h.org	Mon Sep 17 10:21:07 2001
+++ linux/include/linux/sysrq.h	Thu Sep 20 11:42:15 2001
@@ -87,8 +87,17 @@
 }
 
 #else
-#define register_sysrq_key(a,b)		do {} while(0)
-#define unregister_sysrq_key(a,b)	do {} while(0)
+
+static inline int register_sysrq_key(int key, struct sysrq_key_op *op_p)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int unregister_sysrq_key(int key, struct sysrq_key_op *op_p)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #endif
 
 /* Deferred actions */

  reply	other threads:[~2001-09-20 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-20 15:51 [PATCH] fix register_sysrq() in 2.4.9++ Randy.Dunlap
2001-09-20 17:41 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-20 17:48   ` Randy.Dunlap
2001-09-20 17:59     ` Alan Cox
2001-09-20 18:57       ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2001-09-21 22:22         ` [PATCH:v2] " Crutcher Dunnavant
2001-09-21 22:36           ` [PATCH] Magic SysRq alternate fix register functions Crutcher Dunnavant
2001-09-24 16:32             ` Randy.Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BAA3C17.557A2C4E@osdlab.org \
    --to=rddunlap@osdlab.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=crutcher+kernel@datastacks.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.