All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdlab.org>
To: junio@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com
Cc: Alan Cox <laughing@shared-source.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] link failur in Linux 2.4.9-ac16 around apm.o and sysrq.o
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 08:41:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BB49A41.A276AB7E@osdlab.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010927185107.A17861@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk> <7v8zezki0b.fsf@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com> <7v1ykrkgt2.fsf@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com>

junio@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "JNH" == junio  <junio@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com> writes:
> 
> JNH> 2.4.9-ac16 fails to link with CONFIG_APM=y and
> JNH> CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=n.  This is because apm.c unconditionally
> JNH> makes calls to functions (__sysrq_lock_table and friends)
> JNH> defined in sysrq.c.
> 
> JNH> I can think of a couple of different approaches to work this
> JNH> around, but is there an established proper way to resolve this
> JNH> kind of dependency in the kernel code?
> 
> The approaches I listed as (1) and (3) in my previous message
> are non solutions, since it will result in a kernel where apm.o
> makes calls into sysrq functions, whose proper operations would
> depend on sysrq.o to have been properly initialized by other
> parts of the kernel, which still think CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ is not
> defined.
> 
> The below should be a better fix.
> 
> --- 2.4.9-ac16.sffix/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c     Thu Sep 27 12:46:43 2001
> +++ 2.4.9-ac16.sffix/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c     Thu Sep 27 22:41:53 2001
> @@ -201,7 +201,9 @@
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  #include <asm/desc.h>
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ
>  #include <linux/sysrq.h>
> +#endif
> 
>  extern unsigned long get_cmos_time(void);
>  extern void machine_real_restart(unsigned char *, int);
> @@ -697,12 +699,16 @@
>                                         struct kbd_struct *kbd, struct tty_struct *tty) {
>                 apm_power_off();
>  }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ
>  struct sysrq_key_op sysrq_poweroff_op = {
>         handler:        handle_poweroff,
>         help_msg:       "Off",
>         action_msg:     "Power Off\n"
>  };
> -
> +#else
> +# define register_sysrq_key(ig,no) /*re*/
> +# define unregister_sysrq_key(ig,no) /*re*/
> +#endif
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_APM_DO_ENABLE
>  static int apm_enable_power_management(int enable)

Yes, that looks like a decent temporary workaround for apm.c.

What should be done (IMO of course) is that
linux/include/linux/sysrq.h should provide empty/null definitions
of [un]register_sysrq_key()... and it did do that until
2.4.9-ac15, but those #defines are( were) untyped, and they
should be typed (i.e., return 0), just as the versions
of them that are present when CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ is #defined.

~Randy

  reply	other threads:[~2001-09-28 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-27 17:51 Linux 2.4.9-ac16 Alan Cox
2001-09-27 18:26 ` Udo A. Steinberg
2001-09-27 18:28 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-27 19:03 ` [PATCH] 2.4.9-ac16 swapoff 2*vfree Hugh Dickins
2001-09-27 19:36   ` Alexander Viro
2001-09-27 19:03 ` Linux 2.4.9-ac16 Tom Rini
2001-09-27 23:06   ` Alan Cox
2001-09-27 23:11     ` Tom Rini
2001-09-27 19:31 ` Kent Borg
2001-09-28  1:07 ` [REPORT] (PPC) Compile Error (Linux 2.4.9-ac[12-16]) Tsunehiko Baba
2001-09-28 14:15   ` Tom Rini
2001-09-28 14:40     ` Alan Cox
2001-09-28 14:41       ` Tom Rini
2001-09-28  5:21 ` [PATCH] link failur in Linux 2.4.9-ac16 around apm.o and sysrq.o junio
2001-09-28  5:47   ` junio
2001-09-28 15:41     ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2001-09-28 15:58     ` Crutcher Dunnavant
2001-09-28 15:30 ` Linux 2.4.9-ac16 Stefan Becker
2001-09-28 16:39   ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-28 17:15     ` Tim Connors
2001-09-28 20:52 ` Russell King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BB49A41.A276AB7E@osdlab.org \
    --to=rddunlap@osdlab.org \
    --cc=junio@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com \
    --cc=laughing@shared-source.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.