From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3BBC90C9.309A3D75@ti.com> Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 18:39:37 +0200 From: christian e MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm 1.0 and kernel 2.2.19.Is rawio patch necessary ?? References: <3BBC550E.442F190C@ti.com> <3BBC7C22.1119BF0@promofinarsa.es> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ wrote: > Well, I'm in same position than you, but having problems. > I also asked about the necesity of raw-io patches (specifically for > 2.2.19) but till the moment no answer. This concerns me if it's so important to patch with someone ought to know.. I'm not keen on rolling this setup into production if I don't know the consequences of not having a rawio patch applied (if any). > Well, I patched kernel with raw-io for 2.2.18, and then with the lvm > patch provided by ./configure then make at PATCHES, but my kernel didn't > compile (well, the kernel did, but the make modules failed). I think I'll try the 2.2.18 patch as well..Will let you all know if it turned out ok or not.. > > So, from your experience I'm going to try to compile *without* the > raw-io patch and see what happens. Anyway, since I know that at least > your compilation was ended with success, would you be kind enough to > e-mail me your configuration file (/usr/src/linux/.config) to look for > differencies? You've got mail :-) > > And, if you know about the reason or necesity (or lack of) the raw-io > patch stuff, please post it to the list, so others like will know. > TIA > So far I haven't found out..If someone could enlighten us ,please ?? best regards Christian