From: Peter Rival <frival@zk3.dec.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: paulus@samba.org, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trini@kernel.crashing.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] change name of rep_nop
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 14:06:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BBDF6BC.5000300@zk3.dec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15pW6U-0006Xx-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Alan Cox wrote:
>>Here is a patch that addresses those three issues. It adds an empty
>>definition of cpu_relax for all architectures except x86 (for x86 it
>>is defined to be rep_nop), and it changes smp_init to use a barrier
>>instead of making wait_init_idle be volatile.
>>
>>
>
> Looks good to me
You also need to move the call to smp_boot_cpus() below the
clear_bit(...) line in smp_init(). Without it, my Wildfire doesn't get
past the while(wait_init_idle) loop - seems all of the CPUs have already
done their work before the mask is set. Besides, it's the right place
for it anyway. I'd generate a patch, but my system is bogged down in a
benchmark for the next couple of hours. If someone says so, I'll
generate the patch after that...
- Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-05 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-05 10:46 [PATCH] change name of rep_nop Paul Mackerras
2001-10-05 14:37 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-05 18:06 ` Peter Rival [this message]
2001-10-05 23:28 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-10-05 23:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2001-10-06 1:40 ` Paul Mackerras
2001-10-08 19:27 ` Peter Rival
2001-10-08 22:36 ` David Woodhouse
2001-10-08 22:46 ` David S. Miller
2001-10-08 23:16 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-08 23:24 ` Dave Jones
2001-10-08 23:30 ` David S. Miller
2001-10-08 23:33 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-09 5:01 ` George Greer
2001-10-09 10:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-10-09 11:30 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-09 12:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-10-09 12:15 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-08 22:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-08 23:06 ` David Woodhouse
2001-10-08 23:08 ` David S. Miller
2001-10-08 23:42 ` David Woodhouse
2001-10-08 23:46 ` David S. Miller
2001-10-08 23:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-09 0:03 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-09 8:51 Etienne Lorrain
2001-10-09 11:30 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BBDF6BC.5000300@zk3.dec.com \
--to=frival@zk3.dec.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.