From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A448C4851 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 08:50:16 -0600 (MDT) Sender: marteaut@esiee.fr Message-ID: <3BC1BBB5.F1ACA@esiee.fr> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 16:44:05 +0200 From: Thomas Marteau MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Grundler Cc: Matthew Wilcox , "parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org" Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Second Draft of the help for the kernel options References: <200110080348.VAA24289@puffin.external.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-ID: Hi all, I have put the Matthew Wilcox's CPU and 64bit section. For the PDC narrow, a section was already written. So, I do not the change unless you tell that: " 32-bit PDC CONFIG_PDC_NARROW Turning this option on enables support for 32-bit firmware when running a 64-bit kernel. You should select this option if you have a workstation from the C160-J2240 era. " is better than: " 32-bit PDC CONFIG_PDC_NARROW Saying Y here will allow developers with a C180, C200, C240, C360, J200, J210, and/or a J2240 to test 64-bit kernels by providing a wrapper for the 32-bit PDC calls. Since the machines which which require this option do not support over 4G of RAM, this option is targeted for developers of these machines wishing to test changes on both 32-bit and 64-bit configurations. If unsure, say N. " Anyway, thanks for your comment and if you have any idea, please mail me, Thomas. ESIEE Team