From: Ben Smith <ben@google.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 13:08:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BE30B3D.1080505@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15yzlQ-00021P-00@starship.berlin> <15330.56589.291830.542215@abasin.nj.nec.com> <20011102190046.B6003@athlon.random> <20011102181758Z16039-4784+420@humbolt.nl.linux.org> <9ruvkd$jh1$1@penguin.transmeta.com>
> So how much memory is mlocked?
In the 3.5G case, we lock 4 blocks (4 * 427683520 bytes, or 1.631M).
There is code in the kernel that prevents more than 1/2 of all physical
pages from being mlocked:
mlock.c:215-218: (in do_mlock)
/* we may lock at most half of physical memory... */
/* (this check is pretty bogus, but doesn't hurt) */
if (locked > num_physpages/2)
goto out;
For 2.2 we were have a patch that increases this to 90% or 60M, but we
don't use this patch on 2.4 yet.
> Why _does_ this thing do mlock, anyway? What's the point? And how much
> does it try to lock?
Latency. We know exactly what data should remain in memory, so we're
trying to prevent the vm from paging out the wrong data. It makes a huge
difference in performance.
- Ben
Ben Smith
Google, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-02 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-31 18:06 Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13 Daniel Phillips
2001-10-31 20:39 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-31 20:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-31 21:03 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-31 21:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-01 4:52 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-01 16:56 ` undefined reference in 2.2.19 build with Reiserfs (was: Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13) Sven Heinicke
2001-11-01 22:39 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-31 22:12 ` Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13 Ben Smith
2001-11-01 0:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-02 17:51 ` Sven Heinicke
2001-11-02 18:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-02 18:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-02 20:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-02 21:08 ` Ben Smith [this message]
2001-11-02 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-02 22:42 ` Ben Smith
2001-11-02 23:15 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-03 22:53 ` Adaptec vs Symbios performance Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-03 23:01 ` arjan
2001-11-02 21:12 ` Google's mm problem - not reproduced on 2.4.13 Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <200111022027.fA2KRwe20006@penguin.transmeta.com>
2001-11-02 20:58 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-02 18:11 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-02 18:48 ` Sven Heinicke
2001-11-02 18:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-01 0:19 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-01 0:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-11-01 1:17 ` Ben Smith
2001-11-01 1:41 ` Rik van Riel
2001-11-01 1:55 ` Ben Smith
2001-11-01 2:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-31 20:48 ` Rik van Riel
2001-10-31 21:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-10-31 21:08 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111021250560.20078-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
2001-11-02 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-11-02 21:27 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-03 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BE30B3D.1080505@google.com \
--to=ben@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.