From: J Sloan <jjs@pobox.com>
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Thomas Lussnig <tlussnig@bewegungsmelder.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
khttpd mailing list <khttpd-users@zgp.org>,
Tux mailing list <tux-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 11:31:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BE4460F.97FAD9CE@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111032014580.9446-100000@mustard.heime.net>
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> I read something by Linus about linux scalability, and I beleive he said
> that 'linux [2.4] scales good up to 4 cpus, but not that good futher on
> [to 8?]'. Can anyone fill in the holes here?
Nobody scales better 1-4 CPUs, as indicated
by specweb99 - at 8 CPUs linux is OK, but not
as dominating....
When the high end specialists from IBM etc
can send in patches that enhance high end
performance without hurting the low end case
the numbers on 8-32 CPUs should really start
to shine. (There has been progress on that
front seen on lkml)
cu
jjs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-03 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3BE427CD.702@bewegungsmelder.de>
2001-11-03 18:02 ` [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 19:08 ` Thomas Lussnig
2001-11-03 19:14 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 19:21 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-03 19:18 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 19:31 ` J Sloan [this message]
2001-11-04 1:19 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-05 10:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-06 4:46 ` J Sloan
2001-11-03 19:37 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-04 0:07 ` Erik Mouw
2001-11-04 15:32 ` John Alvord
[not found] <3BE42379.2050604@bewegungsmelder.de>
2001-11-03 17:08 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
[not found] <20011103165129.B26040@fenrus.demon.nl>
2001-11-03 16:56 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
[not found] <20011103162642.A25824@fenrus.demon.nl>
2001-11-03 16:43 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-03 18:18 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2001-11-03 20:24 ` Dirk Moerenhout
2001-11-03 16:21 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-04 5:26 ` [khttpd-users] " Chul Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BE4460F.97FAD9CE@pobox.com \
--to=jjs@pobox.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=khttpd-users@zgp.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roy@karlsbakk.net \
--cc=tlussnig@bewegungsmelder.de \
--cc=tux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.