From: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@stesmi.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 14:09:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BE68F75.3010300@stesmi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011104192024.H267@codesourcery.com>
>>>>gcc-2.95.4 does not exist! The latest stable release is 2.95.3.
>>>>
>>>Ah, it does exist. You have to check it out from CVS from the GCC people.
>>>I've no doubt a release will be made soon.
>>>
>>That's what's called a not released product.
>>
>>2.95.4 might or might not be released shortly.
>>
>>It is not the final 2.95.4 that is in the CVS.
>>
>>Another word for it might be BETA...
>>
>
> We're being extremely conservative about patches applied to the 2.95.x
> CVS branch. It is intended always to be release-quality material.
I am aware of this.
> I'm not aware of any plans for an official 2.95.4 anytime soon.
> However, system integrators often track that CVS branch with their GCC
> packages. For instance:
>
> $ gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs
> gcc version 2.95.4 20011006 (Debian prerelease)
I know how it's done, it's just that in my eyes a stable release is the
one where you know there's only 1 .... A 2.95.4 package built on
different days (from CVS) will differ. A 2.95.4 package built on
different ways from a .tar.gz marked as 'release' will not differ.
For instance chasing a kernel bug is difficult when 1 person might use 1
version of a compiler and another uses a different version when both
says 2.95.4, no matter how miniscule the difference.
// Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-05 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-04 20:26 linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ? f5ibh
2001-11-04 20:38 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-04 22:11 ` Heinz Diehl
2001-11-04 23:13 ` Alex Buell
2001-11-05 1:25 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-11-05 3:20 ` Zack Weinberg
2001-11-05 13:09 ` Stefan Smietanowski [this message]
2001-11-05 20:01 ` Zack Weinberg
2001-11-05 21:03 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-11-05 21:45 ` Zack Weinberg
2001-11-05 9:58 ` Alex Buell
2001-11-05 11:47 ` ip autoconfig and e100 Ryan Sweet
2001-11-05 13:12 ` linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ? Stefan Smietanowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BE68F75.3010300@stesmi.com \
--to=stesmi@stesmi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.