From: "Daniel R. Warner" <drwarner@mail.myrealbox.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel.
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 14:42:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BE98EB8.6000802@mail.myrealbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <slrn9uj1nf.5lj.spamtrap@dexter.hensema.xs4all.nl>
Erik Hensema wrote:
> Here's my go at a new design for /proc. I designed it from a userland
> point of view and tried not to drown myself into details.
<snip>
> - Multiple values per file when needed
> A file is a two dimensional array: it has lines and every line
> can consist of multiple fields.
> A good example of this is the current /proc/mounts.
> This can be parsed very easily in all languages.
> No need for single-value files, that's oversimplification.
<snip>
This is fine for reading, but it makes it harder for humans to change
values in /proc - eg, echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn
-D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-07 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-07 19:09 Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel Erik Hensema
2001-11-07 19:27 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-08 0:54 ` /proc discussions Tim Jansen
2001-11-08 2:23 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-07 19:42 ` Daniel R. Warner [this message]
2001-11-07 22:35 ` Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel Allen Campbell
2001-11-07 20:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-07 21:19 ` Justin A
2001-11-07 23:44 ` Rusty Russell
2001-11-08 0:35 ` Stephen Satchell
[not found] <w_knop@hotmail.com>
2001-11-07 19:41 ` William Knop
2001-11-08 0:27 ` John Levon
2001-11-08 8:56 ` Erik Hensema
2001-11-08 10:00 ` Remco Post
2001-11-09 16:44 ` Ricky Beam
2001-11-12 13:31 ` Horst von Brand
2001-11-12 14:31 ` Martin Dalecki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-07 21:13 Brenneke, Matthew Jeffrey (UMR-Student)
2001-11-08 0:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-08 0:20 ` antirez
2001-11-08 0:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-08 0:54 ` David Ford
2001-11-08 1:10 ` antirez
2001-11-08 1:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-11-08 1:51 ` antirez
2001-11-08 0:44 ` Stephen Satchell
2001-11-08 1:04 ` antirez
2001-11-08 0:55 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-11-08 3:07 ` Stuart Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BE98EB8.6000802@mail.myrealbox.com \
--to=drwarner@mail.myrealbox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.