Re: [linux-lvm] patch to fix segfault complaints.

[Jim Cromie <jcromie@divsol.com>]

Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote:

> Hi, Jim!
>
> Jim Cromie (jcromie@divsol.com) wrote 62 lines:
>
> > [root@groucho 1.0.1-rc4]# diff -u configure configure~
> > --- configure Tue Nov 13 09:35:54 2001
> > +++ configure~ Thu Sep  6 07:02:34 2001
> > @@ -796,33 +796,22 @@
>
> This patch seems reversed...
>
> -Wolfgang

yes, I suppose it is, judging from the --- and +++ associated with ARGS.

but before its used, Id like to see discussion on;

whether its accurate enough wrt 2.96-85 or -O1
whether compiler / vendor / phase-of-moon accomodations are appropriate.

how to do it better.

in other words, it probably wont be applied to CVS unless and until
tested by us (the users) ..

so -

did you reverse apply it ? successfully ?
did you formerly have a segfault problem due to -O2 ?  does -O1 fix it
for you ?