All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: J Sloan <jjs@pobox.com>
To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Hahn <hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca>
Subject: Re: sunrpc woes with tux2 in 2.4.15-pre8,9
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 17:48:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BFDAB08.28F8B5C8@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BFD7633.2525641E@pobox.com> <shsn11eidv0.fsf@charged.uio.no> <3BFD9078.63FE28F2@pobox.com> <15357.38291.883472.720575@charged.uio.no>

Trond Myklebust wrote:

> Something is indeed very wrong. Your setup uses a PIII, and no SMP. It
> shouldn't be requiring atomic_dec_and_lock() at all. Certainly this is
> the case on my own setup on stock 2.4.15-pre9.
>
> Could you check that the TUX patch isn't squashing the #define and
> test for ATOMIC_DEC_AND_LOCK that is contained in
> include/linux/spinlock.h in the stock Linus kernel. The latter is a
> workaround that is designed to stop MODVERSIONS from interfering with
> the re-#definition of atomic_dec_and_lock() in spinlock.h.

Yes, it looks like he's doing just that -

I built it with smp enabled and the problem
goes away, so it's an implicit assumption
of smp in the current tux code.

cu

jjs


  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-23  1:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-22 22:03 sunrpc woes with tux2 in 2.4.15-pre8,9 J Sloan
2001-11-22 23:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2001-11-22 23:55   ` J Sloan
2001-11-23  0:17     ` Trond Myklebust
2001-11-23  1:48       ` J Sloan [this message]
2001-11-23 10:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-23 22:43   ` J Sloan
2001-11-23 12:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-11-23 22:46   ` J Sloan
2001-11-24  1:46   ` J Sloan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BFDAB08.28F8B5C8@pobox.com \
    --to=jjs@pobox.com \
    --cc=hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.