From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>, war <war@starband.net>,
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which gcc version?
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:14:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BFEAE22.1CE8DE5B@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011123135801.00aad970@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <5.1.0.14.2.20011123185333.00afd920@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk>, <5.1.0.14.2.20011123185333.00afd920@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <E167M0I-0002PD-00@starship.berlin>
Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> If there is a performance hit, it's not enough to worry about.
except egcs-1.1.2 (2.91.6) compiles stuff at almost twice the speed
of gcc3. The person who breaks egcs-1.1.2 for kernel builds owes
me a quad Xeon, thanks very much.
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-23 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-23 12:53 Which gcc version? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2001-11-23 12:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-11-23 13:51 ` war
2001-11-23 19:43 ` J Sloan
2001-11-23 13:59 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 14:11 ` war
2001-11-23 15:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-11-23 15:30 ` Gábor Lénárt
2001-11-23 15:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-11-23 17:13 ` Re[2]: " Nerijus Baliunas
2001-11-23 19:50 ` J Sloan
2001-11-23 20:34 ` John Jasen
2001-11-23 21:55 ` J Sloan
2001-11-24 3:08 ` John Jasen
2001-11-24 12:24 ` Paul G. Allen
2001-11-26 18:31 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-27 8:42 ` Ahmed Masud
2001-11-23 16:10 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 14:43 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 16:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-11-23 18:30 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-23 18:56 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 19:28 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-23 20:14 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2001-11-23 20:24 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-11-23 20:35 ` Andrew Morton
2001-11-23 21:09 ` David Weinehall
2001-11-24 16:01 ` Luigi Genoni
2001-11-24 16:09 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-11-24 17:32 ` Luigi Genoni
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-23 17:12 RaúlNúñez de Arenas Coronado
2001-11-23 18:02 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2001-11-23 18:14 ` Thorsten Glaser
2001-04-05 10:56 which " Manoj Sontakke
2001-04-05 5:48 ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-05 14:09 ` Manoj Sontakke
2001-04-05 11:37 ` Bart Trojanowski
2001-04-05 12:02 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-04-05 12:26 ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-05 12:31 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-04-05 13:09 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-04-05 11:45 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-04-05 11:50 ` christophe barbe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BFEAE22.1CE8DE5B@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=roy@karlsbakk.net \
--cc=war@starband.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.