From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3C029CAC.761E2AB@netfall.com> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:49:00 -0800 From: Andrew Sharp MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Kernel crashing problems on oldworld References: <20011123032512.C387@Obsession> <3C00772F.783F8720@netfall.com> <20011125180959.B203@Obsession> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Chris Tillman wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 08:44:31PM -0800, Andrew Sharp wrote: > > > > Chris Tillman wrote: > > > Another interesting point is that I can run all the ncurses test > > > programs except worm, which crashes in a few seconds, but only when > > > the console it's running on is actually visible. And, the blink and > > > underline attributes don't seem to work on my system. > > > > > > Finally, I downloaded the kernel-image-2.4.12-powerpc package to see > > > if changing the kernel would make a difference. It did, the nano crash > > > disappeared. The worm crash is still present, though. > > > > > > I can continue trying to trace the problem in worm, if there's > > > interest, since it's present in both kernels. Or if there's interest > > > in the kernel 2.2.19 nano problem, whatever... I am interested in > > > helping track down the problem because it's such a hard crash. My > > > filesystem is of course damaged when I have to hard reboot. > > > > > > I signed up to the list. Let me know what I can try. And Happy > > > Thanksgiving! > > > > Thanks. Are you sure it's not just some memory that's gone bad > > rather than a conflict with the video card? > > > > Well, I don't know how it could hit the same memory location at > exactly the same time over more than 50 attempts (each time rebooting) > and using two different released versions of the program plus my own > compiled versions with debug statements added. Or could it? How would > I test that? > > I wonder if the video card could be moved to the PowerCenter machine > to see if the problem follows it? Probably not... The other machine > does have a different card. It may be an entire bank or line or whatever, not necessarily a particular single addressed location. You can try removing individual sticks of memory, or moving memory around to your other boxes to see if the problem follows any particular stick. a ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/