From: Didier Moens <Didier.Moens@dmb001.rug.ac.be>
To: Nicolas Aspert <Nicolas.Aspert@epfl.ch>
Cc: Abraham vd Merwe <abraham@2d3d.co.za>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
skraw@ithnet.com
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: OOPS in agpgart (2.4.13, 2.4.15pre7)]
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:48:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C036F83.2000903@dmb.rug.ac.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <linux.kernel.3C021570.4000603@dmb.rug.ac.be> <3C022BB4.7080707@epfl.ch> <1006808870.817.0.camel@phantasy> <3C02BF41.1010303@xs4all.be> <20011127101148.C5778@crystal.2d3d.co.za> <3C034CAE.2090103@dmb.rug.ac.be> <20011127111022.B881@crystal.2d3d.co.za> <3C036245.6080105@dmb.rug.ac.be> <3C036553.3040505@epfl.ch>
Nicolas Aspert wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> To sum up : this is an IBM A30p, with an "external" Radeon Mobility LY
>> (32 MB), and an 830MP instead of an 830M. The 830MP is common for both
>> IBM A30 and A30p models.
>>
>>
>
> OK ! so you _do_ have an external graphic card (that's what looked
> unclear to me),
> for which AGP should work in the same way it does for other Intel
> chipsets...
>
> So why not trying the little patch I attach below, which should make
> your stuff work, without breaking too much the i830 support for on-board
> adapters... The patch is for 2.4.16, but is likely to be applied easily
> on another recent kernel. Keep me informed...
1. modprobe agpgart loads OK :
Nov 27 11:34:47 localhost kernel: Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff
Hartmann
Nov 27 11:34:47 localhost kernel: agpgart: Maximum main memory to use
for agp memory: 439M
Nov 27 11:34:47 localhost kernel: agpgart: Detected an Intel 830M, but
could not find the secondary device.
Nov 27 11:34:47 localhost kernel: agpgart: Trying the Intel 830MP stuff
Nov 27 11:34:47 localhost kernel: agpgart: Detected Intel i830M chipset
Nov 27 11:34:47 localhost kernel: agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000
[root@localhost agp]# /home/didier/repository/kernel/testgart
version: 0.99
bridge id: 0x35758086
agp_mode: 0x1f000217
aper_base: 0xd0000000
aper_size: 256
pg_total: 112384
pg_system: 112384
pg_used: 0
entry.key : 0
entry.key : 1
Allocated 8 megs of GART memory
MemoryBenchmark: 858 mb/s
MemoryBenchmark: 876 mb/s
MemoryBenchmark: 890 mb/s
Average speed: 874 mb/s
Testing data integrity (1st pass): passed on first pass.
Testing data integrity (2nd pass): passed on second pass.
2. compared to Stephan's original patches ("if i830m_dev ..." and
"break;") :
Nov 27 11:37:07 localhost kernel: Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff
Hartmann
Nov 27 11:37:07 localhost kernel: agpgart: Maximum main memory to use
for agp memory: 439M
Nov 27 11:37:07 localhost kernel: agpgart: Detected Intel i830M chipset
Nov 27 11:37:07 localhost kernel: agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000
[root@localhost agp]# /home/didier/repository/kernel/testgart
version: 0.99
bridge id: 0x35758086
agp_mode: 0x1f000217
aper_base: 0xd0000000
aper_size: 256
pg_total: 112384
pg_system: 112384
pg_used: 0
entry.key : 0
entry.key : 1
Allocated 8 megs of GART memory
MemoryBenchmark: 859 mb/s
MemoryBenchmark: 887 mb/s
MemoryBenchmark: 876 mb/s
Average speed: 874 mb/s
Testing data integrity (1st pass): passed on first pass.
Testing data integrity (2nd pass): passed on second pass.
Is the 8 megs of GART OK ?
Is the memory benchmark comparable to equally equipped machines (1.2G
P-III(M), i830(MP), ATI Radeon(M)) ? (I'm trying to differentiate my
performance problem between agpgart and X DRI/DRM).
Kind regards,
Didier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-27 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <linux.kernel.3C021570.4000603@dmb.rug.ac.be>
2001-11-26 11:47 ` [Fwd: Re: OOPS in agpgart (2.4.13, 2.4.15pre7)] Nicolas Aspert
2001-11-26 21:07 ` Robert Love
2001-11-26 22:16 ` Didier Moens
2001-11-27 7:57 ` Nicolas Aspert
[not found] ` <20011127101148.C5778@crystal.2d3d.co.za>
[not found] ` <3C034CAE.2090103@dmb.rug.ac.be>
2001-11-27 9:10 ` Abraham vd Merwe
2001-11-27 9:52 ` Didier Moens
2001-11-27 10:05 ` Nicolas Aspert
2001-11-27 10:48 ` Didier Moens [this message]
2001-11-27 11:12 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-27 11:43 ` Nicolas Aspert
2001-11-27 12:10 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-27 12:49 ` Didier Moens
2001-11-27 10:51 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2001-11-26 12:43 ` [PATCH]Re: " Nicolas Aspert
2001-11-26 10:12 Didier Moens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C036F83.2000903@dmb.rug.ac.be \
--to=didier.moens@dmb001.rug.ac.be \
--cc=Nicolas.Aspert@epfl.ch \
--cc=abraham@2d3d.co.za \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.