All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@larsshack.org>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Mandrake 8.1 and LVM
Date: Thu Nov 29 15:16:08 2001	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C06A624.80205@larsshack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: NBBBKLKHMJHIJLHOGAOJOEDFJCAA.steve.wray@the.net.nz

> I don't know why people even think of doing that...
> Can *anyone* give a good reason (and I don't include
> "because its tidier to have everything LVM") for having
> root on LVM?


Sure, for the same reason you put *anything* on LVM -- for flexibility 
in storage allocation.  With root on LVM, you can:

(a) create filesystem snapshots for performing consistent backups (or 
for providing a simple 'oops-I-didn't-mean-to-delete-that-just-now' file 
recovery).

(b) dynamically expand the amount of space available to the root partition.

(c) Migrate data to a new set of disks on a live system.

And, of course, it *is* tidier to have everything on LVM :).

On the other hand, there is an element of risk when managing your root 
filesystem with code that hasn't yet stabilized.  It also leads to 
increased complexity.  In particular, you'll probably want to build some 
sort of rescue CD with LVM support in case something goes wrong, since 
most existing rescue tools don't have LVM support.

-- Lars

  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-29 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-29  7:58 [linux-lvm] Mandrake 8.1 and LVM Sarwer Zafiruddin
2001-11-29 11:15 ` Luca Berra
2001-11-29 15:04   ` Steve Wray
2001-11-29 15:16     ` Lars Kellogg-Stedman [this message]
2001-11-29 15:42       ` mitch
2001-11-29 15:56         ` Steve Wray
2001-11-29 19:09         ` Lars Kellogg-Stedman
2001-12-03 20:12         ` Mark van Walraven
2001-11-30  2:28     ` Luca Berra
2001-12-01 10:58       ` Brian J. Murrell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-29 15:53 Sarwer Zafiruddin
2001-11-29 16:01 ` mitch
2001-11-29 16:06   ` Steve Wray
2001-11-29 18:07   ` Theo Van Dinter
2001-11-30  1:59     ` Chad C. Walstrom
2001-11-30  2:40       ` Steve Wray
2001-11-30 14:18         ` Chad C. Walstrom
2001-11-30 15:53           ` mitch
2001-11-30 19:31             ` Chad C. Walstrom
2001-12-01  0:15               ` mitch
2001-11-30 16:00           ` Petro
2001-11-30 19:27             ` Chad C. Walstrom
2001-11-30 16:04           ` Steve Wray
2001-11-30 19:24             ` Chad C. Walstrom
2001-11-30 10:47       ` Theo Van Dinter
2001-11-30 11:37         ` Luca Berra
2001-11-30 12:02           ` svetljo
2001-12-02  8:24             ` Luca Berra
2001-12-01 10:30     ` Wolfgang Weisselberg
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111291704150.435-100000@sol.rune.org>
2001-11-29 16:14 ` Sarwer Zafiruddin
2001-11-29 16:44   ` Steve Wray
2001-11-30  2:35     ` Luca Berra
2001-12-01 10:17       ` Brian J. Murrell
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111291810070.435-100000@sol.rune.org>
2001-11-29 17:12 ` Sarwer Zafiruddin
2001-12-02  8:55 Luca Berra
2001-12-02  9:22 ` galia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C06A624.80205@larsshack.org \
    --to=lars@larsshack.org \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.