Re: [PATCH] pci_auto handles better when no IO/MEM behind P2P bridge

[Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 129 bytes --]


Perhaps this one is better.

It wastes a little PCI space, but looks more elegant...  Is elegance still
worth anything? :-)

Jun

[-- Attachment #2: pci-auto-p2p-bridge-noiomem.011205.011206.b.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 641 bytes --]

diff -Nru linux-2.4.16/arch/mips/kernel/pci_auto.c.orig linux-2.4.16/arch/mips/kernel/pci_auto.c
--- linux-2.4.16/arch/mips/kernel/pci_auto.c.orig	Mon Nov 26 18:22:58 2001
+++ linux-2.4.16/arch/mips/kernel/pci_auto.c	Thu Dec  6 18:24:00 2001
@@ -256,6 +256,14 @@
 {
 	u32 temp;
 
+	/* 
+	 * [jsun] we always bump up baselines a little, so that if there 
+	 * nothing behind P2P bridge, we don't wind up overlapping IO/MEM 
+	 * spaces.
+	 */
+	pciauto_lower_memspc += 1;
+	pciauto_lower_iospc += 1;
+
 	/* Configure bus number registers */
 	early_write_config_byte(hose, top_bus, current_bus, pci_devfn,
 				PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS, sub_bus);