From: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>
To: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: an old FPU context corruption problem when signal happens
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 08:58:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C219A3B.6DA93A75@mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3C21390A.FA23978D@mvista.com
Are you sure this hasn't been fix in the latest sources (2.4.16) ?
I have send a patch to Ralf, which I believe solves a similar problem as you describe below.
Ralf have you applied the patch ?
/Carsten
Jun Sun wrote:
> This is an incomplete patch, attempting to fix an old fix FPU context
> corruption problem with signal happens.
>
> The following scenario would cause many problems with current code:
>
> 1. process A runs and uses FPU
> 2. Process A is switched out; Process B runs and uses FPU
> 3. Process A runs again, but have not used FPU this time around
> 4. Process A receives a signal.
> 5. Process A's signal handler runs and uses FPU
> 6. Process B runs again and uses FPU.
>
> At step 4, we have last_task_used_fpu being B, current->used_math being 1.
> The current code would save B's FPU context to A's sc structure, but
> does not mark owned_fp bits.
>
> At step 5, when A's sig handler first time uses FPU, FPU is enabled again.
>
> At step 6, when B tries to use FPU again, a lazy fpu switch happens. The
> current FPU regs are stored into A's thread strucutre, effectively eraseing
> previously stored A's FPU context before the sig handler starts.
>
> In addition, B finds its FPU reg values totally bogus when they are loaded
> from B's thread structure, because the FPU regs were saved there. (See
> step 4).
>
> This patch is meant for concept debugging. But it should be easy
> to complete it:
>
> 1. support the two copy_fpu_context function. (note, need to differentiate
> between CPU_HAS_FPU and !CPU_HAS_FPU cases)
> 2. perhaps change ->sc_ownedfp to ->sc_used_fpu, which is really what
> this flag means now.
>
> Any comments?
>
> Jun
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This is an incomplete patch, attempting to fix an old fix FPU context
> corruption problem with signal happens.
>
> The following scenario would cause many problems with current code:
>
> 1. process A runs and uses FPU
> 2. Process A is switched out; Process B runs and uses FPU
> 3. Process A runs again, but have not used FPU this time around
> 4. Process A receives a signal.
> 5. Process A's signal handler runs and uses FPU
> 6. Process B runs again and uses FPU.
>
> At step 4, we have last_task_used_fpu being B, current->used_math being 1.
> The current code would save B's FPU context to A's sc structure, but
> does not mark owned_fp bits.
>
> At step 5, when A's sig handler first time uses FPU, FPU is enabled again.
>
> At step 6, when B tries to use FPU again, a lazy fpu switch happens. The
> current FPU regs are stored into A's thread strucutre, effectively eraseing
> previously stored A's FPU context before the sig handler starts.
>
> In addition, B finds its FPU reg values totally bogus when they are loaded
> from B's thread structure, because the FPU regs were saved there. (See
> step 4).
>
> This patch is meant for concept debugging. But it should be easy
> to complete it:
>
> 1. support the two copy_fpu_context function. (note, need to differentiate
> between CPU_HAS_FPU and !CPU_HAS_FPU cases)
> 2. perhaps change ->sc_ownedfp to ->sc_used_fpu, which is really what
> this flag means now.
>
> Any comments?
>
> Jun
>
> diff -Nru linux.link/arch/mips/kernel/signal.c.orig linux.link/arch/mips/kernel/signal.c
> --- linux.link/arch/mips/kernel/signal.c.orig Tue Nov 27 11:03:02 2001
> +++ linux.link/arch/mips/kernel/signal.c Wed Dec 19 16:28:08 2001
> @@ -222,8 +222,20 @@
>
> err |= __get_user(owned_fp, &sc->sc_ownedfp);
> if (owned_fp) {
> - err |= restore_fp_context(sc);
> - last_task_used_math = current;
> + if ((last_task_used_match == NULL) || (last_task_used_math == current)) {
> + /* if nobody owns FPU, or sig handler owns it,
> + * we just restore FPU regs from sc to hardware */
> + err |= restore_fp_context(sc);
> + last_task_used_math = current;
> + enable_fpu();
> + } else {
> + /* we copy FPU values from sc to task structure */
> + err |= copy_fpu_context_from_sigcontext(current, sc);
> + disable_fpu();
> + }
> +
> + /* in either case, we need to set the used flag */
> + current->used_math = 1;
> }
>
> return err;
> @@ -352,13 +364,25 @@
> err |= __put_user(regs->cp0_cause, &sc->sc_cause);
> err |= __put_user(regs->cp0_badvaddr, &sc->sc_badvaddr);
>
> - owned_fp = (current == last_task_used_math);
> - err |= __put_user(owned_fp, &sc->sc_ownedfp);
> + /* if we ever used FPU, we need to get FPU regs to sc */
> + if (current->used_math) {
> +
> + if (current == last_task_used_math) {
> + /* if we own FPU now, just save fpu to sc directly */
> + enable_fpu();
> + err |= save_fp_context(sc);
> + } else {
> + /* otherwise, we need copy fpu regs from current task
> + * structure to sc structre.
> + */
> + err |= copy_fpu_context_to_sigcontext(current, sc);
> + }
> +
> + /* put remember that we have valid FPU regs in sc */
> + err |= __put_user(current->used_math, &sc->sc_ownedfp);
>
> - if (current->used_math) { /* fp is active. */
> - enable_fpu();
> - err |= save_fp_context(sc);
> - last_task_used_math = NULL;
> + /* we now pretend we have never used FPU before we start sig
> + * handler */
> regs->cp0_status &= ~ST0_CU1;
> current->used_math = 0;
> }
--
_ _ ____ ___ Carsten Langgaard Mailto:carstenl@mips.com
|\ /|||___)(___ MIPS Denmark Direct: +45 4486 5527
| \/ ||| ____) Lautrupvang 4B Switch: +45 4486 5555
TECHNOLOGIES 2750 Ballerup Fax...: +45 4486 5556
Denmark http://www.mips.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-20 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-20 1:04 an old FPU context corruption problem when signal happens Jun Sun
2001-12-20 7:58 ` Carsten Langgaard [this message]
2001-12-20 17:16 ` Jun Sun
2001-12-25 6:41 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-12-25 6:51 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-12-27 10:53 ` Carsten Langgaard
2002-01-02 4:34 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C219A3B.6DA93A75@mips.com \
--to=carstenl@mips.com \
--cc=jsun@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.