From: Petr Titera <P.Titera@century.cz>
To: Peter Osterlund <petero2@telia.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 08:13:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C2AC9FF.8050301@century.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2vgexzv90.fsf@ppro.localdomain>
Peter Osterlund wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When trying to mount an ISO9660 CD on my USB CDRW unit, I get lots
> of "sr: unaligned transfer" messages from the kernel and the mount
> command fails. This message was added in kernel 2.5.1 and the
> sr_scatter_pad() function was removed at the same time. The comment
> above the message hints that unaligned transfers are (or were) a
> normal thing.
>
> I added a printk to get more information:
>
> sr: unaligned transfer
> sr: sector 64, s_size 2048, bufflen 1024
> sr: unaligned transfer
> sr: sector 68, s_size 2048, bufflen 1024
> sr: unaligned transfer
> sr: sector 72, s_size 2048, bufflen 1024
> ...
> sr: unaligned transfer
> sr: sector 396, s_size 2048, bufflen 1024
> Unable to identify CD-ROM format.
>
> So, what changes are needed to make CD support work?
>
>
Use -o block=2048 as your mount option. There is error in sr code
causing block sizes of CD-ROM drives to be incorrectly initialized to
1024 bytes.
Petr Titera
P.Titera@century.cz
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-27 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-23 17:44 "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1 Peter Osterlund
2001-12-23 19:22 ` Greg KH
2001-12-30 9:31 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-12-30 11:27 ` Jens Axboe
2001-12-31 5:27 ` Matthew Dharm
2001-12-31 11:51 ` Jens Axboe
2001-12-31 22:54 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Matthew Dharm
2001-12-31 23:59 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-01-01 17:39 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-01 17:40 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-01 19:53 ` David Brownell
2002-01-01 22:34 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-01 23:28 ` Matthew Dharm
2002-01-02 5:40 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was: "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1] David Brownell
2002-01-02 9:27 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was:"sr: unalignedtransfer" " Oliver.Neukum
2002-01-02 18:43 ` David Brownell
2002-01-02 9:31 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was: "sr: unaligned transfer" " Jens Axboe
2002-01-02 9:30 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1 Jens Axboe
2002-01-02 5:27 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1] David Brownell
2002-01-02 9:32 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-02 18:37 ` David Brownell
2002-01-02 18:44 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-02 18:55 ` David Brownell
2002-01-02 20:23 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-02 22:32 ` [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was "sr: unalignedtransfer" " Oliver.Neukum
2001-12-24 4:05 ` "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1 Bob_Tracy
2001-12-24 7:24 ` Peter Osterlund
2001-12-24 14:13 ` WHICH MACHINE????? Astinus
2001-12-24 15:37 ` Erik Mouw
2001-12-25 15:41 ` Svein Ove Aas
2001-12-26 13:56 ` Erik Mouw
2001-12-24 16:19 ` J.A. Magallon
2001-12-24 22:48 ` "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1 Peter Osterlund
2001-12-27 7:13 ` Petr Titera [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C2AC9FF.8050301@century.cz \
--to=p.titera@century.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petero2@telia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.