From: Martin Knoblauch <knobi@sirius-cafe.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Scheduler issue 1, RT tasks ...
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 10:45:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C2C3F55.3BA4A0C3@sirius-cafe.de> (raw)
> Re: [RFC] Scheduler issue 1, RT tasks ...
>
> >
> > Right, that was my question. George says, in your words, "for better
>
> > standards compliancy ..." and I want to know why you guys think
> that.
>
> The thought was that if someone need RT tasks he probably need a very
> low
> latency and so the idea that by applying global preemption decisions
> would
> lead to a better compliancy. But i'll be happy to ear that this is
> false
> anyway ...
>
without wanting to start a RT flame-fest, what do people really want
when they talk about RT in this [Linux] context:
- very low latency
- deterministic latency ("never to exceed")
- both
- something completely different
Thanks
Martin
--
+-----------------------------------------------------+
|Martin Knoblauch |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
|http://www.knobisoft.de/cats |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
|e-mail: knobi@knobisoft.de |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
next reply other threads:[~2001-12-28 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-28 9:45 Martin Knoblauch [this message]
2001-12-29 9:12 ` [RFC] Scheduler issue 1, RT tasks george anzinger
[not found] <200112291907.LAA25639@messenger.mvista.com>
2001-12-30 10:01 ` george anzinger
2001-12-30 19:54 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-12-31 13:56 ` george anzinger
2002-01-01 18:55 ` Dieter Nützel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-29 19:02 Dieter Nützel
2001-12-29 21:00 ` Andrew Morton
2001-12-29 22:24 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-20 21:11 Davide Libenzi
2001-12-20 22:25 ` george anzinger
2001-12-20 22:21 ` Momchil Velikov
2001-12-20 22:57 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-21 17:00 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-12-21 17:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-21 17:33 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-12-21 18:29 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-24 0:18 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-12-24 1:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-24 5:33 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-12-24 18:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-27 3:01 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-12-27 17:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-28 0:05 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-12-28 0:48 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-20 22:36 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-24 0:19 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-12-24 1:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-27 3:42 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-12-27 17:48 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C2C3F55.3BA4A0C3@sirius-cafe.de \
--to=knobi@sirius-cafe.de \
--cc=knobi@knobisoft.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.