From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: admin@nextframe.net
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/psi240i.c - io_request_lock fix
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 20:09:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C3B9853.740E71DA@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020108150738.B6168@sexything>
Morten Helgesen wrote:
>
> Hey Linus and the rest of you.
>
> A simple fix for the io_request_lock issue leftovers in drivers/scsi/psi240i.c.
> Not tested, but compiles. Diffed against 2.5.2-pre10. Please apply.
>
Morten,
There is a bit more involved than just switching
io_request_lock to host_lock. The former is global
so it could be called from anywhere.
>From the look of this line in the patch:
> + struct Scsi_Host *host = PsiHost[irq - 10];
It will work if the first controller is allocated irq 10,
the second one irq 11, etc. Unlikely ...
Looking at that driver it seems that it will need a
bit of surgery to pass perhaps a Scsi_Cmnd pointer
through the request_irq() function so you can
follow a pointer chain in do_Irq_Handler() to get
hold of the appropriate host_lock.
In the lk 2.5 series host_lock should indeed be held
when the callback "scsi_done" is invoked and that
most likely occurs in Irq_Handler(). So that is right.
BTW To get a better idea of what is involved, diff the
sym53c8xx driver in lk 2.4.15 and the one in the
lk 2.5 series now [kudos to Gerard Roudier].
Having been burnt by a well meaning advansys patch that
converted a kernel compile time error into a kernel
boot time freeze, it is a bit worrying the number
of "untested" patches of this nature appearing on lkml.
Doug Gilbert
> --- vanilla-linux-2.5.2-pre10/drivers/scsi/psi240i.c Tue Jan 8 10:57:31 2002
> +++ patched-linux-2.5.2-pre10/drivers/scsi/psi240i.c Tue Jan 8 14:48:56 2002
> @@ -370,10 +370,11 @@
> static void do_Irq_Handler (int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> + struct Scsi_Host *host = PsiHost[irq - 10];
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&io_request_lock, flags);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->host_lock, flags);
> Irq_Handler(irq, dev_id, regs);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_request_lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->host_lock, flags);
> }
> /****************************************************************
> * Name: Psi240i_QueueCommand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-09 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-08 14:07 [PATCH] drivers/scsi/psi240i.c - io_request_lock fix Morten Helgesen
2002-01-09 1:09 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2002-01-09 10:46 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-09 11:07 ` Morten Helgesen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-09 13:28 Adam J. Richter
2002-01-09 13:52 ` Morten Helgesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C3B9853.740E71DA@torque.net \
--to=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=admin@nextframe.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.