From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why not "attach" patches?
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:59:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C448A31.A08EBBF7@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16QZFv-0005wy-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Some implementation-specific details people may find useful:
* For 4.xx versions of Netscape Mail, with standard mime types/prefs,
sending patches by MIME attachment results in a readable text/plain
message.
* The best way to mail patches is to pipe a header, patch description,
and contents to "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t" or some other MTA. When I spam
Linus or Marcelo with patches, my process looks like this:
1) create outgoing patches
2) change e-mail header template to reflect current kernel version
3) put template and blank space at top of each patch
4) "vi *.patch", manually insert descriptions and CC list from
MAINTAINERS
5) review each patch and description once again :)
6) pipe *.patch individually through "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
Here is the mail header template I use. Sendmail is smart and will
insert all other headers like message-id and date, since they are not
present. When using another MTA, make sure yours does this too.
> [jgarzik@rum g]$ cat ~/info/mail.linus
> From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at mandrakesoft.com>
> BCC: jgarzik at mandrakesoft.com
> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at transmeta.com>
> CC: akpm at zip.com.au, davem at redhat.com
> Subject: PATCH 2.5.2.9: net drvr
>
As always, read Documentation/SubmittingPatches. That's what it's there
for.
--
Jeff Garzik | Alternate titles for LOTR:
Building 1024 | Fast Times at Uruk-Hai
MandrakeSoft | The Took, the Elf, His Daughter and Her Lover
| Samwise Gamgee: International Hobbit of Mystery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-15 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-15 17:44 Why not "attach" patches? Martin Eriksson
2002-01-15 17:47 ` David S. Miller
2002-01-15 17:52 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-01-15 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-15 18:50 ` Richard Gooch
2002-01-15 19:28 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-15 19:29 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-01-15 19:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-01-15 22:09 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-01-15 22:16 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-01-16 0:11 ` Removing the whitespaces??? [Was: Re: Why not "attach" patches?] Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-01-16 4:16 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-01-17 8:56 ` Ravindra Jaju
2002-01-16 0:26 ` Stuart Young
2002-01-15 23:13 ` Why not "attach" patches? Urban Widmark
2002-01-15 23:51 ` Sebastian Benoit
2002-01-15 19:59 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2002-01-21 16:15 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-01-22 18:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-24 6:59 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-01-16 11:46 ` Christoph Rohland
2002-01-16 17:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-15 17:57 ` Kent Borg
2002-01-15 19:38 ` Martin Eriksson
2002-01-15 19:48 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-01-15 23:34 ` Johan Kullstam
2002-01-15 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-01-15 18:39 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C448A31.A08EBBF7@mandrakesoft.com \
--to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.