All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikhil Goel <nikhil@smartbridges.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Ramya Ravichandran <rrhsin@yahoo.co.in>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Cf Card vs DiskOnChip
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:16:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C513E7B.6010808@smartbridges.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4181.1011956000@redhat.com

David Woodhouse wrote:

> rrhsin@yahoo.co.in said:
> 
>>industrial environment. I am unable to decide whether to use a Compact
>>Flash card or DiskOnChip.With 128MB I need to get the whole thing
>>running. Can someone plese tell me as which one to use and why? 
> 
> The downside of the DiskOnChip is that the Linux driver doesn't do wear 
> levelling, although it's easy enough to add, and that the vendor's driver 
> is a binary-only module and hence of dubious legality.
> 
> I would go for the DiskOnChip and add wear levelling support - all you need 
> to do it make it randomly pick a clean block for erasure occasionally, to 
> make sure stuff moves around over time.


Isn't that similar to the implementation of JFFS? So a DiskOnChip 
running on the CVS based driver with JFFS should suffice for 
wear-levelling! if I am missing some piece here, what should I rtfm?

regards,
nikhil



-- 

-- 
Nikhil Goel <nikhil@smartbridges.com>
Ph: +65 3240210  Ext 20, Fax: +65 3240607
Reality is a crutch for those who can't handle science fiction.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-25 11:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-25 10:39 Cf Card vs DiskOnChip Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-25 10:53 ` David Woodhouse
2002-01-25 11:16   ` Nikhil Goel [this message]
2002-01-25 11:57     ` David Woodhouse
2002-01-25 16:26   ` Richard Gooch
2002-01-25 16:50     ` David Woodhouse
2002-01-26  4:19       ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-26  5:49         ` Russ Dill
2002-01-26  6:19           ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-26 12:25         ` kira brown
2002-01-25 11:42 ` kira brown
2002-01-25 12:33   ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-25 13:23     ` Robert Schwebel
2002-01-25 22:28       ` Chris Fowler
2002-01-25 14:14     ` Johan Adolfsson
2002-01-25 14:15       ` kira brown
     [not found] <1012026130.25150.0.camel@russ>
2002-01-26  6:29 ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-26  7:31   ` Charles Manning
2002-01-26  8:05     ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-26 13:50       ` kira brown
2002-01-26 20:06       ` Russ Dill
2002-01-28  1:35       ` Charles Manning
2002-01-28  6:18         ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-28 17:12           ` Charles Manning
2002-01-28  9:21         ` kira brown
2002-01-28 10:03           ` Ramya Ravichandran
2002-01-28 18:46             ` Alessandro Staltari
2002-01-28 10:08           ` Ramya Ravichandran
     [not found]         ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201280914130.9494-100000@hex.linuxgrrls.org >
2002-01-28 15:26           ` Mark Sienkiewicz
2002-01-26  9:16   ` David Woodhouse
2002-01-26 15:03   ` Chris Fowler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C513E7B.6010808@smartbridges.com \
    --to=nikhil@smartbridges.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=rrhsin@yahoo.co.in \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.