All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: thread_info implementation
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 22:08:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C6832CC.D9D27F2F@linux-m68k.org> (raw)

Hi,

I'm currently wondering how to implement the recent thread_info changes
for m68k, unfortunately I can't find any discussion about it on lkml,
why it was done this way.

1. I more liked the previous byte fields instead of the bitmasks.
bitfield/bitmask instructions are at least 2 bytes longer than a simple
test instruction for m68k. I got this now nicely optimized (see
http://linux-m68k-cvs.apia.dhs.org/c/cvsweb/linux/arch/m68k/kernel/entry.S?rev=1.6&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup)
and changing it back to bitmasks would make it worse again.
2. I can understand that we split the task structure from the stack, but
why have thread_info and task_struct to be two different pointers? I'd
prefer two keep one pointer, through everything is accessed, that means
thread_info would be part of task_struct.

bye, Roman

             reply	other threads:[~2002-02-11 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-11 21:08 Roman Zippel [this message]
2002-02-11 20:50 ` thread_info implementation Anton Blanchard
2002-02-12  0:46   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  0:57     ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  0:57       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:10         ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12 13:01         ` Bjorn Wesen
2002-02-12 13:49           ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:01     ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  1:07       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:21         ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  1:32           ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:36             ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  1:41               ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  1:53                 ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  2:22                   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  2:30                     ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  2:36                       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  2:46                         ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  2:51                           ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  3:01                             ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  3:04                               ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  3:18                                 ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  3:23                                   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  3:32                                     ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  3:42                                       ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  4:16                                         ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  4:21                                           ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  4:33                                             ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  5:26                                       ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-12  5:32                                         ` David S. Miller
2002-02-12  5:50                                           ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12  5:57                                           ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-13 11:18                                         ` Anton Blanchard
2002-02-12 17:14                                 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-13  0:46                                   ` David S. Miller
2002-02-13  1:30                                     ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  9:12                             ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  9:30                               ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-12 10:14                                 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12 13:21                             ` David Howells
2002-02-12 19:15                               ` David Mosberger
2002-02-12 19:38                                 ` David Howells
2002-02-12  2:49                       ` Davide Libenzi
2002-02-12  0:01 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-12  0:10   ` David Howells
2002-02-12  0:22     ` Roman Zippel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-11 17:39 Arkadiy Chapkis - Arc
2002-02-11 20:19 ` Robert Love
2002-02-11 20:42   ` Luigi Genoni
2002-02-11 20:48     ` Robert Love
2002-02-11 23:37       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-11 23:49         ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-12  0:09           ` Dave Jones
2002-02-12  0:20             ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-12  0:24               ` Dave Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C6832CC.D9D27F2F@linux-m68k.org \
    --to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.