From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, davidm@hpl.hp.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
zippel@linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 05:01:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C6CDC8E.A16D39D7@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12214.1013706194@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <3C6CDB4D.D072A7B4@mandrakesoft.com>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Your patch would be ok IMHO if you additionally changed the arches to
> include task struct inside struct thread_info, getting things back down
> to a single allocation for thread_info+task_struct, with 'current' once
> again being a constant offset from the beginning of thread_info. [this
> might require resurrecting the old patches to move task struct
> definitions out of sched.h proper]
Actually, you don't really need the definition of task_struct, if
include dependencies get really hairy... you really only need the size
of the task struct.
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik | "I went through my candy like hot oatmeal
Building 1024 | through an internally-buttered weasel."
MandrakeSoft | - goats.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-15 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-14 15:26 [PATCH] move task_struct allocation to arch David Howells
2002-02-14 16:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-14 16:32 ` David Howells
2002-02-14 16:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-14 17:03 ` David Howells
2002-02-14 20:48 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-14 23:53 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-15 9:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-15 10:01 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2002-02-15 11:25 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 11:37 ` David Howells
2002-02-15 12:20 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 12:56 ` David Howells
2002-02-15 13:49 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 13:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-15 14:22 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 14:07 ` David Howells
2002-02-15 14:28 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-15 21:56 ` Richard Henderson
2002-02-15 21:52 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C6CDC8E.A16D39D7@mandrakesoft.com \
--to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.