From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3C73078F.A962A59A@quantumtek.net> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:18:55 -0500 From: George Fouse MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Metrix CC: SELinux@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: Re: 2.2 kernel series References: <20020220005027.31760.qmail@web20602.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov I'm afraid that I would have to completely disagree with the stated premise "most people are sticking with 2.2 in a production enviroment". While there are (more accurately, have been) some issues with the 2.4 series, the obvious advantages predominate. Given that premise, though, I understand his questions. 'Nough said. Metrix wrote: > > why develop 2.4, 2.5 even? 2.4 has had quite a lot of > problems, most people are sticking with 2.2 in a > production enviroment, it would seem that the 2.2 > selinux patches are not being updated, which is a > shame. also, does selinux audit there code ala openbsd? > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games > http://sports.yahoo.com > -- ------------------------------ George Fouse, President Quantum Technology Associates System and Network Services ------------------------------ -- You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.