From: Brian Ristuccia <bristucc@sw.starentnetworks.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kernel nfsd consuming 100% CPU on 2.4.17 and 2.4.18 with reiserfs?
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 08:48:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C7B9212.5050400@sw.starentnetworks.com> (raw)
It seems that kernel nfsd consumes an inordinate amount of CPU time
during writes on this machine. With a few hundred kb/sec being written
over NFSv3 from a 2.2.17 client, all of the nfsd threads each consume as
much of the available CPU time as possible. On a similarly configured
machine with ext3 instead of reiserfs, nfsd consumes much less CPU time.
Is there a known issue with NFSv3 performance and reiserfs?
--
Brian Ristuccia
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-26 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-26 13:48 Brian Ristuccia [this message]
2002-02-26 14:55 ` kernel nfsd consuming 100% CPU on 2.4.17 and 2.4.18 with reiserfs? Chris Mason
2002-02-26 15:09 ` Brian Ristuccia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C7B9212.5050400@sw.starentnetworks.com \
--to=bristucc@sw.starentnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.