From: dart <dart@windeath.2y.net>
To: davidsen@tmr.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:41:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C7F22A7.BA7916DF@windeath.2y.net> (raw)
<massive snippage>
> That sounds very nice, but in practice it means it would never happen, and
> you know it.
Excuse me...I've been a lurker and sometimes tester since 2.0.*. I've
been working my way through man (3) to learn enough to submit a coherent
patch and I don't appreciate you telling me I can't do it. I've searched
your submissions to LKML and all I see are opinions, ie ==
!code_submitted.
> This process could take six months to a year, after which we can start the
> process with the scheduler.
Who exactly are "we" anyway? I know it's not me because I haven't
contributed DIDDLY for code just yet.
Just a note: CD Burner, Parport/ECP/EPP/Zip broken with 2.4.17, will try
2.4.19. 2.4.18 too ugly to test.
Apologies to the kernel-list, I usually try to limit my noise...
--
Dart
"I have studied many philosophers and many cats.
The wisdom of cats is infinitely superior." -- Hippolyte Taine
next reply other threads:[~2002-03-01 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-01 6:41 dart [this message]
2002-03-05 21:49 ` 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree Bill Davidsen
2002-03-06 1:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06 1:45 ` James M.
2002-03-06 16:50 ` Ken Brownfield
2002-03-07 10:11 ` Leonid Mamtchenkov
2002-03-06 23:34 ` Yven Leist
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-26 0:35 Dieter Nützel
2002-02-26 1:02 ` Ken Brownfield
2002-02-26 1:13 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-26 7:20 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-26 1:39 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26 1:15 ` Shawn Starr
2002-02-26 1:32 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-24 5:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 4:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-26 11:42 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-26 1:40 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-26 1:49 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-26 1:51 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26 8:36 ` Christoph Rohland
2002-02-26 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-02-26 16:21 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 16:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-02-28 22:45 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-02-28 23:04 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-01 3:02 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-03-01 3:13 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-01 3:43 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-03-01 10:36 ` Sean Hunter
2002-03-01 17:13 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-03-01 6:29 ` Olivier Galibert
2002-03-01 16:28 ` Dan Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C7F22A7.BA7916DF@windeath.2y.net \
--to=dart@windeath.2y.net \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.