From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3C7F6654.25F7E0FE@lvl7.com> Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 06:30:28 -0500 From: Neil Horman MIME-Version: 1.0 To: laurent.pinchart@capflow.com Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Development tools version References: <3C7E3471.4080708@capflow.com> <3C7E372A.7B4E5F0@lvl7.com> <3C7F3507.1060702@capflow.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Yes, binutils 2.11.2. Sorry about my fat fingers... :) Say....Speaking of those memory faults. I never got around to researching them. Can you or anyone else provide general notes on exactly what those patches fix? I'd certainly appreciate it, as I always wanted to track those down, but never quite found the time. Thanks! Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > > > >I think that the Hard Hat tools will probably be the easiest for you to get up > >and running with. They have probably been the most throughly debugged for the > >8xx. Although if your looking to put together your own tools for the 860 > >series, we here have built the following, with a reasonably good deal of > >success. See the notes for details: > > > >Binutils: > > 2.1.2 - no problems at all. Download and build them for powerpc-linux and away > >you go > > > >GCC: > > 2.95.3 - again no real problems. > > > >GLIBC: > > 2.2.4 - relatively easy. Some issues with memory faults on occasion, which I > >have not yet traked down. > > > >GDB: > > 5.1.1 - no problems > > > >General notes: > > I've personally been following the embedded cross-gcc mini howto available on > >penguinppc.com and I've been more or less happy with the results. hope that > >helps! > > > Thanks Neil. > > I've been able to succesfully use the Hard Hat binaries (actually that's > so simple that I wouldn't have dared asking questions in this mailing > list if I hadn't :-), but I'd like to recompile from the sources, in > order not to depend on a binary release, and also to be able to modify > the tools if needed. > > I tried to compile the tools from the sources without patching them a > few months ago, and experienced memory faults and a lot of other > problems with dynamically linked executables (is that a known issue ?). > > Recompiling from the SRPMS shouldn't be a hard job, so that's what I'll > try. All the patches are supposed to be included in there... > > Just to make sure, did you mean binutils 2.11.2 ? > > Laurent Pinchart ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/