All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Cc: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] delayed disk block allocation
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 23:27:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C8321DE.EE6A47B0@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C7F3B4A.41DB7754@zip.com.au> <E16hhuI-0000S6-00@starship.berlin> <3C82E5A1.714081EA@mandrakesoft.com>

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> ...
> >
> > You're not even trying to apply this to swap cache right now are you?
> 
> This is a disagreement akpm and I have, actually :)
> 

Misunderstanding, rather.

Swapfiles aren't interesting, IMO.  And I agree that mkswap or swapon
should just barf if the file has any holes in it.

But what I refer to here is, simply, delayed allocate for swapspace.
So swap_out() sticks the target page into the swapcache, marks it
dirty and takes a space reservation for the page out of the swapcache's
address_space.  But no disk space is allocated at swap_out() time.
Instead, the real disk mapping is created when the VM calls
a_ops->vm_writeback() against the swapcache page's address_space.  

All of which rather implies a ripup-and-rewrite of half the swap
code.  It would certainly require a new allocator. So I just mentioned
the possibility.  Glad you're interested :)

-

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-04  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-01  8:26 [patch] delayed disk block allocation Andrew Morton
2002-03-04  2:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-03-04  3:10   ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-04  7:27     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-03-04  5:04   ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-04  5:31     ` Andreas Dilger
2002-03-04  5:40       ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-04  6:14         ` Andreas Dilger
2002-03-04  5:41       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-04  6:18         ` Andreas Dilger
2002-03-04 15:02           ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-06 12:59             ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-04  7:53       ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-04  8:06         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-03-04  8:34           ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-04  7:20   ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-04  9:23     ` Daniel Phillips
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-04 14:54 rwhron
2002-03-04 15:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-07 12:06 Etienne Lorrain
2002-03-07 14:47 ` Steve Lord
2002-03-07 17:30   ` Mike Fedyk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C8321DE.EE6A47B0@zip.com.au \
    --to=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lord@sgi.com \
    --cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.