From: Emmanuel Chaput <Emmanuel.Chaput@enseeiht.fr>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: timer question
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 14:57:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C84CED2.2000603@enseeiht.fr> (raw)
Hi !
I have a problem with the first part of run_timer_list() :
if (!tv1.index) {
int n = 1;
do {
cascade_timers(tvecs[n]);
} while (tvecs[n]->index == 1 && ++n < NOOF_TVECS);
}
My problem is that tv*.index is initialized to 0, so the first call to
run_timer_list() will result in a (useless) call to cascade_timers() for
tvecs[1..NOOF_TVECS - 1].
Am I wrong ? Thanks to anyone who could help me !
--
Emmanuel Chaput Dépt Télécom & Réseau, ENSEEIHT
*5 61 58 82 10 (Fax *5 61 58 80 14) Emmanuel.Chaput@enseeiht.fr
next reply other threads:[~2002-03-05 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-05 13:57 Emmanuel Chaput [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-31 21:11 timer question Chuck Lever
2004-03-31 21:31 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-04-01 6:10 ` Chris Friesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C84CED2.2000603@enseeiht.fr \
--to=emmanuel.chaput@enseeiht.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.