From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom McNeal Subject: Re: kernel version problem Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 07:55:07 -0800 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3C92195B.BE165F9E@attbi.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com ([204.127.198.39]) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 16lu20-0005CN-00 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 07:54:12 -0800 To: Tina Arora Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: 2.2.16 is an adequate base to start from, but if you're able to make bigger changes, and want the best nfs platform for 2.2, then go to 2.2.19. For 2.2.16, Go to http://nfs.sourceforge.net/ and follow the link to the download page (containing both the nfs-utils tar balls and the kernel patches). You need to apply the kernel-nfs-dhiggen_merge-3.0.tar.gz download to 2.2.16. Apply the latest nfs utils download (nfs-utils-0.3.3.tar.gz) Both have readme files; they'll give you the requirements and tell you what to do. Tom McNeal > Tina Arora wrote: > > hi, > nfs.soureforge.net talks of kernel version atleast 2.2.18 to use nfs version 3 > .My system shows > "Red Hat Linux release 7.0(Guinness) > Kernel 2.2.16-22 on i686" > Nebody ne clues what this -22 means and also will i be able to use nfs (3) on > this system of mine.. > thanx > Tina -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Tom McNeal trmcneal@attbi.com (650)906-0761 (cell) ------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs