From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fadvise syscall?
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 03:07:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C95A031.6070107@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C945635.4050101@mandrakesoft.com> <3C945A5A.9673053F@zip.com.au> <5.1.0.14.2.20020317131910.0522b490@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <3C959716.6040308@mandrakesoft.com> <3C959D55.14768770@zip.com.au>
Andrew Morton wrote:
>posix_fadvise() looks to be a fine interface:
>
>We'll need to cheat a bit on the offset/len thing for NORMAL and
>SEQUENTIAL - just apply it to the whole file - we don't want to have to
>attach an arbitrary number of silly range objects to each file for this.
>(We already cheat a bit this way with msync).
>
yep
>Given this, I don't see a persuasive need to implement a non-standard
>interface. It takes an off_t, so posix_fadvise64() is also needed.
>
agreed WRT non-standard.
Are we required to have both foo and foo64 variants? If I had my
druthers, I would just do the foo64 version.
>
>A 2.4 implementation could be done any time. If anyone decides to
>do this, please let me know...
>
count me down as interested after my current project... If someone else
does it, more power to them...
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-18 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-17 8:39 fadvise syscall? Jeff Garzik
2002-03-17 8:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-17 9:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-17 20:18 ` Richard Gooch
2002-03-17 13:41 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-17 14:31 ` Simon Richter
2002-03-17 14:56 ` Jan Hudec
2002-03-17 15:00 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-17 19:20 ` Joel Becker
2002-03-17 23:59 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-18 7:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-18 7:55 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-18 8:07 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2002-03-18 8:17 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-18 16:41 ` Richard Gooch
2002-03-18 19:00 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-18 19:15 ` Richard Gooch
2002-03-22 16:05 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-24 6:38 ` Stevie O
2002-03-24 11:24 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-24 12:52 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-25 11:12 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-18 8:05 ` Joel Becker
2002-03-18 8:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-18 8:20 ` Joel Becker
2002-03-18 8:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-18 14:39 ` Martin K. Petersen
2002-03-18 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-18 19:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
2002-03-19 20:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-03-19 23:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2002-03-17 15:13 ` Ken Hirsch
2002-03-17 17:14 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-17 18:31 ` Mark Mielke
2002-03-17 18:35 ` Ken Hirsch
2002-03-17 19:06 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-17 20:19 ` Ken Hirsch
2002-03-18 0:12 ` Anton Altaparmakov
[not found] ` <a73ujs$5mc$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
2002-03-18 8:58 ` Jan Hudec
2002-03-18 10:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-18 17:29 ` Mark Mielke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C95A031.6070107@mandrakesoft.com \
--to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.