From: Anders Peter Fugmann <afu@fugmann.dhs.org>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.19pre4-ac1
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:45:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CA1081D.7040101@fugmann.dhs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16pvYV-0003cD-00@the-village.bc.nu> <3CA0EAAA.8000400@fugmann.dhs.org> <15520.61687.962869.841296@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au>
Thanks.
It seems that there is some more problems.
I have not verified the lookup (since I just booted right away with the patch), but
I have found that:
Mar 26 23:56:58 gw kernel: nfsd: LOOKUP(3) 24: 03000001 03000900 00000002 0000106d 0000106c 0000070d WMRootMenu
Mar 26 23:56:58 gw kernel: RPC request reserved 240 but used 244
Mar 27 00:30:09 gw kernel: nfsd: CREATE(3) 24: 03000001 03000900 00000002 00000003 00000002 00000000 test
Mar 27 00:30:09 gw kernel: RPC request reserved 272 but used 276
Mar 27 00:30:21 gw kernel: nfsd: SYMLINK(3) 24: 03000001 03000900 00000002 00000003 00000002 00000000 test1 -> test
Mar 27 00:30:21 gw kernel: RPC request reserved 272 but used 276
And there might be others.
I would be happy to post a patch, but I do not know the
exact reason for the calculations in struct svc_procedure.
I guess that it has to do with how the request is constructed.
Regards
Anders Fugmann
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-26 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-26 18:20 Linux 2.4.19pre4-ac1 Alan Cox
2002-03-26 21:39 ` Anders Peter Fugmann
2002-03-26 22:06 ` Neil Brown
2002-03-26 23:45 ` Anders Peter Fugmann [this message]
2002-03-27 2:07 ` Neil Brown
2002-03-27 2:29 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-27 12:18 ` Anders Peter Fugmann
2002-03-27 2:47 ` Mike Fedyk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-26 18:34 Dana Lacoste
2002-03-26 18:56 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-27 3:23 Neil Brown
2002-03-27 14:29 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CA1081D.7040101@fugmann.dhs.org \
--to=afu@fugmann.dhs.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.