From: Frank Rowand <frank_rowand@mvista.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@lvl7.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: question regarding a call stack from an oops message
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 10:25:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CA9F79A.99F5D00B@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3CA9BF54.EAA3CEBD@lvl7.com
Neil Horman wrote:
>
> Hello all!
> If anyone has a moment, I've got a question regarding the attached oops
> message. On the platform we are debugging we get this occasional oops message
> (attached). It doesn't start in any one point from the application code, but
> the lower half of it (from sys_read down) is always identiacal. Specifically I'm
> interested in the following snippet:
> >Trace; c00202d4 <handle_mm_fault+6c/100>
> >Trace; c0009e3c <Letext+190/3cc>
> >Trace; c00029a8 <ret_from_except+0/34>
> >Trace; c02e6e94 <END_OF_CODE+19a49c/???
> >Trace; c002397c <do_generic_file_read+260/48c>
> Questions:
> 1) Can anyone think of any other theories that might cause this END_OF_CODE
> stack frame behavior?
> 2) Regarding the Letext stack frame: I see this often as well, and I'm a little
> puzzled. Is its appearance to be expected. I expected to see after a
> ret_from_except stack frame a link to one of the memory management handler
> routines (do_page_fault, etc), but I don't. For my own education, what is that
> Letext line?
If you look in System.map you should see that each address for which an Letext
entry also has another entry with a valid name.
You can get better symbols in your stack trace if you do something like:
mv System.map System.map.OLD
grep -v Letext System.map.OLD >System.map
-Frank
--
Frank Rowand <frank_rowand@mvista.com>
MontaVista Software, Inc
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-02 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-02 14:25 question regarding a call stack from an oops message Neil Horman
2002-04-02 18:25 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2002-04-02 18:44 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CA9F79A.99F5D00B@mvista.com \
--to=frank_rowand@mvista.com \
--cc=frowand@mvista.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=nhorman@lvl7.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.