All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ron Reed <ron.reed@arm.gov>
To: NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RedHat Linux 2.4.9-31 and Solaris 5.7 with Apache
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 08:59:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CAB18EE.4000809@arm.gov> (raw)

I have run into a strange problem that is causing me some headaches. I
have done some searches for an answer, we have even talked with RedHat
support with no solution. I am hopeing that someone on the list can help
me solve this. Here is the setup, a Redhat 7.1, kernel 2.4.9-31, with
the latest nfs-utils release has a 140 gig raid array attached to it.
This is our NFS server. One of the clients is a Sun Solaris 5.7 machine.
Everything seems to work just fine, until something happens to the
Apache 1.3.19 daemon running on the Solaris over a NFS mount. Here is
the oops output that has been run thru ksymoops:

ksymoops 2.4.0 on i686 2.4.9-31.  Options used
      -V (default)
      -k /proc/ksyms (default)
      -l /proc/modules (default)
      -o /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/ (default)
      -m /boot/System.map-2.4.9-31 (default)

Warning: You did not tell me where to find symbol information.  I will
assume that the log matches the kernel and modules that are running
right now and I'll use the default options above for symbol resolution.
If the current kernel and/or modules do not match the log, you can get
more accurate output by telling me the kernel version and where to find
map, modules, ksyms etc.  ksymoops -h explains the options.

Error (expand_objects): cannot stat(/lib/aic7xxx.o) for aic7xxx
Error (expand_objects): cannot stat(/lib/megaraid.o) for megaraid
Error (expand_objects): cannot stat(/lib/aacraid.o) for aacraid
Error (expand_objects): cannot stat(/lib/sd_mod.o) for sd_mod
Error (expand_objects): cannot stat(/lib/scsi_mod.o) for scsi_mod
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol partition_name  , ksyms_base 
says c01ad97c, System.map says c01510cc.  Ignoring ksyms_base entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlmsvc_grace_period  , lockd 
says e0976674, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o says 
e0975ad4.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlmsvc_ops  , lockd says 
e0976670, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o says e0975ad0. 
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlmsvc_timeout  , lockd says 
e0976678, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o says e0975ad8. 
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/fs/lockd/lockd.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nfs_debug  , sunrpc says 
e0968560, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says 
e0968240.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nfsd_debug  , sunrpc says 
e0968564, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says 
e0968244.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol nlm_debug  , sunrpc says 
e0968568, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says 
e0968248.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_debug  , sunrpc says 
e096855c, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says 
e096823c.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_garbage_args  , sunrpc 
says e096853c, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says 
e096821c.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_success  , sunrpc says 
e096852c, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says 
e096820c.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol rpc_system_err  , sunrpc says 
e0968540, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says 
e0968220.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol xdr_one  , sunrpc says 
e0968524, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says 
e0968204.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol xdr_two  , sunrpc says 
e0968528, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says 
e0968208.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol xdr_zero  , sunrpc says 
e0968520, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o says 
e0968200.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/net/sunrpc/sunrpc.o entry
Warning (map_ksym_to_module): cannot match loaded module aacraid to a 
unique module object.  Trace may not be reliable.
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol sd  , sd_mod says e081bea0, 
/lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/scsi/sd_mod.o says e081be00. 
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/scsi/sd_mod.o entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol proc_scsi  , scsi_mod says 
e081715c, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o says 
e0815994.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o 
entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol scsi_devicelist  , scsi_mod 
says e0817188, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o says 
e08159c0.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o 
entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol scsi_hostlist  , scsi_mod 
says e0817184, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o says 
e08159bc.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o 
entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol scsi_hosts  , scsi_mod says 
e081718c, /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o says 
e08159c4.  Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o 
entry
Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on symbol scsi_logging_level  , 
scsi_mod says e0817158, 
/lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o says e0815990. 
Ignoring /lib/modules/2.4.9-31/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o entry
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: c014044e
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: *pde = 00000000
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: Oops: 0002
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: CPU:    0
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: EIP: 
0010:[locks_delete_block+14/68]    Not tainted
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: EIP:    0010:[<c014044e>]    Not tainted
Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: eax: c9470c70   ebx: de3dc69c   ecx: 
c9470c7c   edx: 00000000
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: esi: c9470c7c   edi: dccd8000   ebp: 
de3dc690   esp: dccd9eb8
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: Process lockd (pid: 722, 
stackpage=dccd9000)
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: Stack: c9470c70 c014054e c9470c70 
de3dc69c de3dc690 de3dc694 00000000 de3dc690
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel:        c0140627 de3dc690 00000000 
00000000 df737220 00000000 c013ff88 7fffffff
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel:        00000000 c0140ed1 df7372d0 
00000000 ffffffff 7fffffff ffffffff 7fffffff
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: Call Trace: 
[locks_wake_up_blocks+94/140] locks_wake_up_blocks [kernel] 0x5e
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: Call Trace: [<c014054e>] 
locks_wake_up_blocks [kernel] 0x5e
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<c0140627>] locks_delete_lock 
[kernel] 0x73
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<c013ff88>] locks_alloc_lock [kernel] 
0x30
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<c0140ed1>] posix_lock_file [kernel] 
0x2cd
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<e096c6b5>] lockd_down_Ra7b91a7b 
[lockd] 0xb2d
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<e096c62e>] lockd_down_Ra7b91a7b 
[lockd] 0xaa6
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<e0970b51>] 
nlmsvc_invalidate_client_Rb1c3f825 [lockd] 0x2a61
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<e09761cc>] 
__insmod_lockd_S.data_L2956 [lockd] 0x90c
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<e095efa8>] svc_process_R02aedea7 
[sunrpc] 0x304
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<e0975938>] 
__insmod_lockd_S.data_L2956 [lockd] 0x78
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<e097595c>] 
__insmod_lockd_S.data_L2956 [lockd] 0x9c
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<e096b9d3>] nlmclnt_proc_R4c9f6104 
[lockd] 0x15a3
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<c010567a>] kernel_thread [kernel] 0x26
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: [<e096b82c>] nlmclnt_proc_R4c9f6104 
[lockd] 0x13fc
Apr  2 19:35:16 nfs-twpc3 kernel: Code: 89 5a 04 89 13 c7 41 04 00 00 00 
00 89 48 0c 89 48 10 8d 48

 >>EIP; c014044e <locks_delete_block+e/44>   <=====
Trace; c014054e <locks_wake_up_blocks+5e/8c>
Trace; c0140627 <locks_delete_lock+73/cc>
Trace; c013ff88 <locks_alloc_lock+30/48>
Trace; c0140ed1 <posix_lock_file+2cd/51c>
Trace; e096c6b5 <[lockd]nlmsvc_cancel_blocked+6d/94>
Trace; e096c62e <[lockd]nlmsvc_unlock+aa/c4>
Trace; e0970b51 <[lockd]nlm4svc_proc_unlock+7d/c0>
Trace; e09761cc <[lockd]nlmsvc_procedures4+80/2ff>
Trace; e095efa8 <[sunrpc]svc_process+304/54c>
Trace; e0975938 <[lockd]nlmsvc_version4+0/10>
Trace; e097595c <[lockd]nlmsvc_program+0/1c>
Trace; e096b9d3 <[lockd]lockd+1a7/264>
Trace; c010567a <kernel_thread+26/30>
Trace; e096b82c <[lockd]lockd+0/264>
Code;  c014044e <locks_delete_block+e/44>
00000000 <_EIP>:
Code;  c014044e <locks_delete_block+e/44>   <=====
    0:   89 5a 04                  mov    %ebx,0x4(%edx)   <=====
Code;  c0140451 <locks_delete_block+11/44>
    3:   89 13                     mov    %edx,(%ebx)
Code;  c0140453 <locks_delete_block+13/44>
    5:   c7 41 04 00 00 00 00      movl   $0x0,0x4(%ecx)
Code;  c014045a <locks_delete_block+1a/44>
    c:   89 48 0c                  mov    %ecx,0xc(%eax)
Code;  c014045d <locks_delete_block+1d/44>
    f:   89 48 10                  mov    %ecx,0x10(%eax)
Code;  c0140460 <locks_delete_block+20/44>
   12:   8d 48 00                  lea    0x0(%eax),%ecx


22 warnings and 5 errors issued.  Results may not be reliable.

Does anyone have any sugguestions on this? There are 4 of these network
setups in production around the world and I need to fix all of them as
soon as I can.

Ron Reed



_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

             reply	other threads:[~2002-04-03 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-03 14:59 Ron Reed [this message]
2002-04-04 10:38 ` RedHat Linux 2.4.9-31 and Solaris 5.7 with Apache Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CAB18EE.4000809@arm.gov \
    --to=ron.reed@arm.gov \
    --cc=NFS@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.