From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manuel Krause Subject: Question on IICACHE and mount info (2.4.19-pre5) Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 02:00:03 +0200 Message-ID: <3CACE903.30901@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: reiserfs-list Hi! Is there only the addidional mount option "iicache" with this patch: ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/linux-2.4.19p4-iicache-new-5.patch ? There were some more in the early versions of iicache, IIRC. But at the moment it works very well with 2.4.19-pre5 + rml.preempt+lock-break + aa.vm-33 + some other aa patches and some akpm ones. When I put ",iicache" to the fstab lines of my reiserfs partitions I don't get a response from # cat "/proc/fs/reiserfs/ide0(3,11)/super" state: REISERFS_VALID_FS mount options: BORDER NO_TAILS LOG ... # cat "/proc/fs/reiserfs/ide0(3,7)/super" state: REISERFS_VALID_FS mount options: BORDER NO_TAILS LOG ... # cat /proc/mounts /dev/root / reiserfs rw,noatime 0 0 /dev/hda11 /mnt/beta reiserfs rw,noatime,nosuid,nodev 0 0 ... only # mount says: /dev/hda7 on / type reiserfs (rw,noatime,notail,iicache) ... /dev/hda11 on /mnt/beta type reiserfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,notail,iicache) ... Seems like some things have gone with the latest patches which worked before? It's o.k., of course, if "iicache" doesn't show up for now, I know it's for testing only (yes, it would be very nice!). But the "notail" thing worked before! Best regards, Manuel