From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Question on IICACHE and mount info (2.4.19-pre5) Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 19:02:43 +0400 Message-ID: <3CB1B113.1040109@namesys.com> References: <3CACE903.30901@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> <20020405090248.A6915@namesys.com> <3CB182B0.4030009@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> <20020408160226.A937@namesys.com> <3CB19106.90401@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> <20020408165954.A1635@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Manuel Krause , reiserfs-list Oleg Drokin wrote: >Hello! > >On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 02:45:58PM +0200, Manuel Krause wrote: > >>>Hm, things are not so good here. >>>Too bad you do not have any file-size distribution statistics. >>> >>Is there an easy way to get this info from the filesystems? >> > >Nikita gave you two examples ;) > >>>>Yes, I have differences. But I think they're not the ones we wanted to >>>>see?! I double checked the lines I pasted to this email ;-) >>>> >>>I believe right now we have better patches to speed-up things both on read >>>(IDE only) and write that we are testing mostly locally. >>> >>Could you make them available on the namesys server? ;-) >> > >As I said, we are still testing this stuff and do we do not want for someone to >accidentally apply the patches that were not tested enough. >I can send these to you if you want to perform some benchamrks, though. > >Bye, > Oleg > > I'd like you to post the new code to the mailing list, and encourage people to play around with it (without using it for real data). We need more people benchmarking it so that we can get some results and some discussions. Hans