From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Courtier-Dutton Subject: Re: ALSA homepage redesign Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 14:22:12 +0100 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3CBEC884.2080906@superbug.demon.co.uk> References: <20020418060011.EEE042757@sitemail.everyone.net> <3CBEC605.B2C217C0@zhevny.com> Reply-To: James@superbug.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: linux-audio-dev@music.columbia.edu List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: >Hi Patrick, > >Thanks for doing this. > >The new page doesn't say anything about using the 0.9.x version rather >than 0.5.x. Is it possible to have the main page make it clear that >0.9.0beta12 is the version new users and developers should start with? > >-Eric Rz. > >Patrick Shirkey wrote: > > >>I have now migrated the new ALSA homepage. It was redesigned to be more user friendly. >> >>http://www.alsa-project.org >> >>I will now add new links to the native applications page. >> >>So far I have: >> >>jack >>Ardour >>TiMidity >>Glame >>PD >>Rosengarden >>MusE >> >>Are these correct and are there any others? >> >>-- >> >> Currently, xine (http://xine.sf.net) supports the 0.9.x alsa interface but not the 0.5.x interface. I think we should have a section on the web site for the different applications which support different alsa versions. Cheers James