Re: [PATCH] Re: SSE related security hole

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> 
>>I mean, if they change the registers layout, and so if they require a
>>different empty FPU state, they must as well add yet another bitflag to
>>enable SSE3, if they don't the chip isn't backwards compatible.
> 
> 
> I have unofficial confirmation from Intel that the way to architecturally
> initialize the FPU state is indeed something like
> 
>         memset(&fxsave, 0, sizeof(struct i387_fxsave_struct));
>         fxsave.cwd = 0x37f;
>         fxsave.mxcsr = 0x1f80;
>         fxrstor(&fxsave);
> 
> and the person in question is trying to make sure this is documented so
> that we won't be bitten by this in the future.
> 

Great!

	-hpa