From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Manuel Krause <manuel.krause@mb.tu-ilmenau.de>
Subject: Re: Comparison of notail and notail,iicache(14) 2.4.19-pre7
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 03:09:28 +0200
Message-ID: <3CC75748.7030502@mb.tu-ilmenau.de>
References: <3CC730DC.1000602@mb.tu-ilmenau.de> <3CC736DC.3060300@mb.tu-ilmenau.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-10158-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: reiserfs-list <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

 >
 > Sorry, I just see I've always forgotten to mention I use RMLs preempt +
 > lock-break patches, too. More info upon a stable configuration on this
 > setup for dd backups and VMware sessions - just mail. (Just in case
 > someone faced same problems I did.)
 >

And I've hadone seldom file experience with iicache.

My NS6' localstore.rdf did not work after copying-to and copying-back.
Mmh. Could really be, I had this before with previous versions of
iicache applied. Nothing in the logs. No reiserfsck errors. Now I've
made a new one nearly automatically. Don't know how to catch this one.

Seldom.


Manuel