From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Re: New to reiserfs
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 00:57:53 +0400
Message-ID: <3CE028D1.8070605@namesys.com>
References: <200205132153.59075.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <3CE01BE0.2000003@swelltech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-10304-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9"; format="flowed"
To: Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
Cc: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Dieter_N=FCtzel?= <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>, Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>, Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>, ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>, JPASTORM@esade.edu, Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM>

Joe Cooper wrote:

> Dieter N=FCtzel wrote:
>
>> On Monday 13 May 2002 10:07, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>>> squid will benefit from your putting all files in one directory.
>>
>
> Hi Hans and all,
>
> Out of curiosity...When did this become true?  I haven't tested in=20
> some time, but way back in 2.4.0pre days it was very far from reality=20
> (all-in-one-dir was about 20-30% slower than the standard default of=20
> x/256/256).
>
> I'll be happy to run some Polygraph runs of this...I wasn't aware=20
> anything had changed, however.  Perhaps someone has a pointer for the=20
> relevant changelog entries?

Perhaps I misremember, Nikita, please comment.

Hans