From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: EVMS Reiser FSIM
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 16:56:33 +0400
Message-ID: <3CF62181.1000802@namesys.com>
References: <OF7550755B.8F3C611F-ON85256BC8.0056E5DC@pok.ibm.com> <20020530095323.GA1076@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-10453-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Andrew Clausen <clausen@gnu.org>
Cc: Steve Pratt <slpratt@us.ibm.com>, Yury Umanets <umka@namesys.com>, reiserfs-list <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Andrew Clausen wrote:

>On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:28:38AM -0500, Steve Pratt wrote:
>  
>
>>I want to use the code approved by the owners of the file system.
>>    
>>
>
>Me too.  Just the ext2 maintainer doesn't like this approach, so
>I'm going to need to push a bit harder (and I don't have time now)
>
I can imagine why he doesn't want to depend on the ext2 guys to find 
time for reading his code, and you should not assume he is without good 
reasons on this.   I have watched people try to get code into ext2.....

Hans