From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Emmanuel Fleury Subject: Re: Security flaw in Stateful filtering ?????? Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 11:31:31 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <3D007D73.9030609@cs.auc.dk> References: <3D006B9E.1040809@cs.auc.dk> <200206071105.42881.hno@marasystems.com> Reply-To: netfilter-devel@lists.samba.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.samba.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.samba.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > > This configuration can be done just fine with iptables as demonstrated in my > earlier message, but here we go again (but slightly different): > > # Allow existing connections > iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT > # Allow hidden net to initiate new connections (including connection pickup) > iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -j ACCEPT > # Drop anything else > iptables -A FORWARD -j DROP Sorry, I don't understand something ! :-/ Does that mean that you DROP all the ACKs, even those which are valid ? Regards -- Emmanuel I am not a vegetarian because I love animals; I am a vegetarian because I hate plants. -- A. Whitney Brown