From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Emmanuel Fleury Subject: Re: Security flaw in Stateful filtering ?????? Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 04:13:58 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <3D016866.3090304@cs.auc.dk> References: <3D006B9E.1040809@cs.auc.dk> <20020607220256.GT28055@titanium.brain.org> Reply-To: netfilter-devel@lists.samba.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.samba.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.samba.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Ben Reser wrote: > > So submit a patch to the documentation. One of the very first emails to > answer your original post said that a patch to the documentation would > be accepted and probably applied promptly. > > The issue is understood. No point in going on and on and on about how > the documentation is wrong in your opinion. Spend your time fixing it > instead of bitching about it. If I have to fix the documentation, I would like to understand the exact behaviour of the connection tracking module. My point is not to go "on and on and on", but "deeper and deeper and deeper". Once I reach to right amount of knowledge about it, I will fix it (or I will make it so clear that anybody which has followed the thread will be abble to fix it). Is it ok ? -- Emmanuel Help me out, and I won't ever call "netfilter" a heap of stinking dung again. Do we have a deal? -- Linus Torvalds