From: Tom McNeal <trmcneal@attbi.com>
To: NFS maillist <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Utils package testing
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:33:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D062664.C93B7399@attbi.com> (raw)
Hi -
I've finished testing the latest utils package, nfs-utils-1-0-1-pre8,
both with udp and tcp mounts to the server, in both a 2.4.18 standard
and patched (Trond's NFS_ALL patch) environment, and it is ready to
go as far as I am concerned. The difference between pre7 and pre8
was simply a warning message in exports.c, so any testing being
done on MP platforms (by those of you who have access to them)
need not be repeated.
A couple of questions have come up in my testing, which may have
to be addressed elsewhere, but are not related to the package:
- Does locking take a much longer time in ext3 file systems,
or in the patched environment? In the patched kernel,
exporting ext3, the connectathon lock tests seemed to take
up to 10x as long, but that was over many hours, with a big
load. When run just once with the other connectathon tests,
it didn't seem so different.
- The client net statistics in /proc/net/rpc/nfs seems to remain
at 0 regardless of the activity and regardless of the kernel.
I'm going to start browsing through the kernel code to see
if there is something obvious, but maybe someone knows about
this already. I didn't see anything in the mailing list.
Anyway, as soon as we hear results of MP testing, I'd say its
ready to ship.
Tom
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Tom McNeal trmcneal@attbi.com (650)906-0761 (cell)
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next reply other threads:[~2002-06-11 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-11 16:33 Tom McNeal [this message]
2002-06-12 12:21 ` Utils package testing Trond Myklebust
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-12 15:22 Bruce Allan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D062664.C93B7399@attbi.com \
--to=trmcneal@attbi.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.