From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzband.ncsc.mil (jazzband.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.4]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA11745 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 02:22:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jazzband.ncsc.mil (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jazzband.ncsc.mil with ESMTP id GAA04103 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 06:21:04 GMT Received: from coffeesaur2.evoserve.com (evoworks.evoserve.com [210.16.10.5]) by jazzband.ncsc.mil with ESMTP id GAA04099 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 06:21:03 GMT Received: from evoworks.evoserve.com (evoworks.evoserve.com [210.16.10.5]) by coffeesaur2.evoserve.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28540816AF for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:22:16 +0800 (PHT) Message-ID: <3D098B97.7030903@evoworks.evoserve.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:22:15 +0800 From: Debian User MIME-Version: 1.0 To: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: uclibc and selinux Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Works very well. Are there legal problems if I merge libsecure into uclibc? Its easier incorporating selinux into embedded linux. How about incremental policy updates? So the policy does not have to contain all possible policies needed in a system? Also whats the best way to isolate users from each other when the passwd file contains only "root" and "user" accounts? -- You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.