From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: "Bloch, Jack" <Jack.Bloch@icn.siemens.com>,
"'netdev@oss.sgi.com'" <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: IP stack question
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:48:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D175B5F.5050403@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.GSO.4.30.0206240922230.12806-100000@shell.cyberus.ca
jamal wrote:
> I tried to explain to you in private mail:
> Both 10.1.1.4 and 10.1.1.5 are recognized to be local addresses
> by the IP stack. It is legit that the stack limits the scope
> to just that i.e _local_
> The only way to do what you want to do is bypass the IP stack.
> Use packet socket to write your test app.
> (which actually probably defetas the whole purpose of what you may
> be trying to do -- HA).
It would not defeat the purpose of detecting at least one bad network
link of the two.
I wonder if a ping -I eth1 255.255.255.255 would accomplish the
goal as well?
I would actually like to be able to force a machine to not do local
routing as well, and force packets out over an interface even if
the destination is a local IP, using source-based-routing,
or something similar. There is no way to do this currently?
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-24 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-24 11:39 IP stack question Bloch, Jack
2002-06-24 13:34 ` jamal
2002-06-24 17:48 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2002-06-24 18:59 ` jamal
2002-06-24 19:27 ` Ben Greear
2002-08-28 6:25 ` IP stack question (how to force pkts to not route locally, but go out interfaces regardless of destination) Ben Greear
2002-08-28 12:41 ` James R. Leu
2002-08-29 10:17 ` A question on RTT estimation of SACKed packet Xiaoliang (David) Wei
2002-08-29 19:01 ` kuznet
2002-08-29 22:19 ` Xiaoliang (David) Wei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-20 14:50 IP stack question Bloch, Jack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D175B5F.5050403@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=Jack.Bloch@icn.siemens.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.