From: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>,
"linux-mips@oss.sgi.com" <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: LTP testing
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:21:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D186E76.63B33B0E@mips.com> (raw)
The next LTP failure line is:
pipe05 1 BROK : Unexpected signal 11 received.
For this one I haven't got a fix, because the failure is due to the way
the pipe syscall is implemented for MIPS (so we need a fix in both the
kernel and glibc).
The glibc code look like this
SYSCALL__ (pipe, 1)
/* Plop in the two descriptors. */
sw v0, 0(a0)
sw v1, 4(a0)
/* Go out with a clean status. */
move v0, zero
j ra
.end __pipe
The problem is that the code is called with $a0 = 0. So the 'sw v0,
0(a0)' after the syscall generates a segmentation fault.
Why are the pipe syscall implemented this way, where we return the two
descriptors in v0 and v1 ?
Why doesn't the kernel do these stores (this way we can do an access
check, like i386 does) ?
/Carsten
--
_ _ ____ ___ Carsten Langgaard Mailto:carstenl@mips.com
|\ /|||___)(___ MIPS Denmark Direct: +45 4486 5527
| \/ ||| ____) Lautrupvang 4B Switch: +45 4486 5555
TECHNOLOGIES 2750 Ballerup Fax...: +45 4486 5556
Denmark http://www.mips.com
next reply other threads:[~2002-06-25 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-25 13:21 Carsten Langgaard [this message]
2002-06-25 13:53 ` LTP testing Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-06-25 14:18 ` Carsten Langgaard
2002-06-25 14:56 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-06-25 15:06 ` Carsten Langgaard
2002-06-25 15:28 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-06-25 14:28 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2002-06-25 14:39 ` Ralf Baechle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-25 10:47 Carsten Langgaard
2002-06-25 9:59 Carsten Langgaard
2002-06-25 12:07 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-06-25 7:15 Carsten Langgaard
2002-06-25 13:59 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D186E76.63B33B0E@mips.com \
--to=carstenl@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.